Calculating SO(3) Generators and [J_k, r^2]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kara386
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the commutation relations involving the SO(3) generators \( J_k \) and the position and momentum operators \( \mathbf{r} \) and \( \mathbf{p} \). Participants seek clarification on the operator forms of \( J_k \) and how to demonstrate that \( [J_k, r^2] = 0 \). The operator forms of \( J_k \) are represented by specific matrices, and the angular momentum generators are defined as \( \mathbf{J} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{p} \) in component form. The discussion emphasizes the need to verify the commutation relation for all three components of \( J_k \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically commutation relations.
  • Familiarity with the SO(3) group and its generators.
  • Knowledge of angular momentum in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in matrix representation of operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the operator forms of angular momentum generators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of commutation relations in quantum systems.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of the SO(3) group and its applications.
  • Investigate the physical significance of the relation \( [J_k, r^2] = 0 \) in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying angular momentum, commutation relations, and the mathematical structure of the SO(3) group.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Using the commutation relations ##[x,p_x] = i\hbar## etc, together with the ##SO(3)## generators ##J_k (k=x,y,z)## in their operator form to calculate ##[J_x, \mathbf{r}]## and ##[J_x, \mathbf{p}]## where ##r = (x, y, z)## and ##p = (p_x, p_y, p_z)##.

Then show that ##[J_k, r^2]=0##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't find the operator forms anywhere. I have looked on the internet and in textbooks, but nowhere does it specifically state that a particular form is the 'operator' form. Is it just these matrices:
##
\left( \begin{array}{ccc}
0& 0 & 0 \\
0& 0 & 1 \\
0& -1 & 0 \end{array} \right) ##
##
\left( \begin{array}{ccc}
0& 0 & -1 \\
0& 0 & 0 \\
1& & 0 \end{array} \right) ##
##
\left( \begin{array}{ccc}
0& 1 & 0 \\
-1& 0 & 0 \\
0& 0 & 0 \end{array} \right) ##
Even if that's the case how could I show ##[J_k, r^2]=0##? ##J_k## could be anyone of the three. Do I have to show it for all of them?
Any help is much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What textbook or lecture notes are you using? (I'd have thought the operator form of the ##J_k## would have been provided.)
I'm guessing you're meant to use the angular momentum generators ##{\mathbf J} = {\mathbf r}\times{\mathbf p}##. In component form, this is ##J_i = \epsilon_{ijk} r_j p_k## (using implicit summation over repeated indices).
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K