Calculating the area of a sphere

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vitaniarain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a sphere in the context of Schwarzschild geometry, specifically for a sphere of radius 2M. Participants explore the definitions and implications of the radius in this geometry, as well as the relevant formulas for area and volume.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to calculate the area of a sphere in Schwarzschild geometry, specifically for a radius of 2M.
  • Another participant states that in Schwarzschild coordinates, the radial coordinate r is defined such that the surface area is 4πr².
  • A different participant claims the area is 4πM, providing a formula for radial distance and volume between two radii, but notes that the formulas are valid only up to the event horizon.
  • One participant challenges the assumption that the r coordinate leads to the area being 4πr², referencing a source that defines r intrinsically based on the area of surfaces of transitivity.
  • Another participant reiterates the challenge, expressing confusion over the formulas provided and asking for clarification if they are incorrect.
  • There is a question about whether the area should be 4πM or 16πM, with a participant reasoning that if r = 2M, then the area should be 16πM.
  • A later reply confirms the calculation of area as 16πM and suggests a formula relating mass directly to area without needing to consider the radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct area calculation, with some asserting it is 4πM while others argue it should be 16πM. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the definitions and implications of the radius in Schwarzschild geometry.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of radius in Schwarzschild coordinates and the conditions under which the provided formulas are valid. The discussion includes complex mathematical expressions that may not be fully captured or understood by all participants.

vitaniarain
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How do you calculate the area of a sphere? for example in schwarzschild geometry and considering only the three dimensional spatial metric, what would be the area (and how do u calculate it) of a sphere of radius 2M?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how you define the radius. In Schwarzschild coordinates, the radial coordinate r is simply defined so that the surface area is [itex]4\pi r^2[/itex] (or, equivalently, so that the circumference is [itex]2\pi r[/itex]).
 
The area is 4 pi M, approximately 12.56637062*M

For completeness sake:

The radial distance for an stationary observer between r1 and r2 is:

[tex] \sqrt {r_{{2}} \left( r_{{2}}-2\,M \right) }-\sqrt {r_{{1}} \left( r_{<br /> {1}}-2\,M \right) }+2\,M\ln \left( {\frac {\sqrt {r_{{2}}}+\sqrt {r_{<br /> {2}}-2\,M}}{\sqrt {r_{{1}}}+\sqrt {r_{{1}}-2\,M}}} \right) [/tex]

The volume between r1 and r2 is :

[tex] 4/3\,\pi \,\sqrt {{r_{{2}}}^{5} \left( r_{{2}}-2\,M \right) }+10/3\,<br /> \pi \,M\sqrt {{r_{{2}}}^{3} \left( r_{{2}}-2\,M \right) }+10\,\pi \,{M<br /> }^{2}\sqrt {r_{{2}} \left( r_{{2}}-2\,M \right) }+20\,\pi \,{M}^{3}<br /> \ln \left( 1/2\,{\frac {r_{{2}}}{M}}+1/2\,\sqrt {2\,{\frac {r_{{2}}}{<br /> M}}-4} \right) -4/3\,\pi \,\sqrt {{r_{{1}}}^{5} \left( r_{{1}}-2\,M<br /> \right) }-10/3\,\pi \,M\sqrt {{r_{{1}}}^{3} \left( r_{{1}}-2\,M<br /> \right) }-10\,\pi \,{M}^{2}\sqrt {r_{{1}} \left( r_{{1}}-2\,M<br /> \right) }-20\,\pi \,{M}^{3}\ln \left( 1/2\,{\frac {r_{{1}}}{M}}+1/2<br /> \,\sqrt {2\,{\frac {r_{{1}}}{M}}-4} \right) [/tex]

The Latex is cut off, but if you click on it you get the complete formula. I do not know how to use line breaks as the standard \\ does not seem to work, perhaps a moderator could help.

These formulas work up to and including the EH. There are other formulas that work passed the EH but only up to and not including r=0.
 
Last edited:
Passionflower, you're assuming what you want to prove, because the r coordinate you're using was defined so that the result was true.

See, for example, Hawking and Ellis, p. 149: "The coordinate r in this metric form is intrinsically defined by the requirement that [itex]4\pi r^2[/itex] is the area of these surfaces of transitivity."
 
bcrowell said:
Passionflower, you're assuming what you want to prove, because the r coordinate you're using was defined so that the result was true.

See, for example, Hawking and Ellis, p. 149: "The coordinate r in this metric form is intrinsically defined by the requirement that [itex]4\pi r^2[/itex] is the area of these surfaces of transitivity."
I don't want to prove anything I simply gave the poster the formulas to calculate area, distance and volume using Schwarzschild coordinates.

If there is something wrong with the formulas please tell if not I do not know what your problem is.
 
So is it 4 pi M or 16 pi M. Because if the area is 4*pi*r^2 and r = 2M it should be 16*pi*M right?
 
vitaniarain said:
...the area is 4*pi*r^2 and r = 2M it should be 16*pi*M right?
Right!

Or if you want to be complete:

A = 16 pi G2 m2/c4.​

You can go directly from the mass to the area, there is no need to actually consider the radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
567
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K