Calculating the Center of Mass of a Uniform Thin Hoop Using Symmetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter String theory guy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uniform
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass (CM) of a uniform thin hoop, focusing on the application of symmetry principles rather than specific coordinate systems like polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various symmetry arguments to determine the CM, including pairing diametrically opposite segments and considering rotational symmetry. Some express a desire to avoid polar coordinates in their reasoning.

Discussion Status

Several approaches have been suggested, including symmetry arguments and integration techniques. Participants are actively engaging with each other's ideas, questioning assumptions, and clarifying methods without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted emphasis on avoiding polar coordinates, with some participants expressing a need for alternative methods to understand the problem setup and solution process.

String theory guy
Messages
26
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Is there a way of solving this problem without without using polar coordinate's.
Relevant Equations
CM formula
1671083335722.png

1671083353784.png

1671083368331.png
in
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
An easy way is to pair up diametrically opposite identical segments and observe that the mass centre of each pair is at the origin.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy
By rotational symmetry, the CM must be at the centre.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and String theory guy
Sorry I was not clear. I would like to understand how to solve this problem without using polar coordinate's.
 
Start with the definition of the x-position of the CM relative to the center, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{1}{M}\int x~dm=\frac{1}{M}\int x~\lambda ds$$ where ##ds## is an arc element ##ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}.##
Now $$x^2+y^2=R^2\implies xdx+ydy=0\implies dy=-\frac{xdx}{y}.$$Therefore $$ds=\sqrt{dx^2+\frac{x^2 dx^2}{y^2}}=dx\sqrt{\frac{x^2+y^2}{y^2}}=R\frac{dx}{|y|}.$$Thus if we integrate over a semicircle from the 3 o'clock position to the 9 o'clock position, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{|y|}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{\sqrt{R^2-x^2}}.$$At this point you can
  1. Observe that you have an odd function integrated over symmetric limits which means that it vanishes. This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
  2. Actually do the integral and verify that it vanishes. Let ##u^2=R^2-x^2##, etc. etc.
Obviously, the integral that completes the circle from the 9 o'clock position to the 3 o'clock position also vanishes and so do the integrals for ##Y_{\text{cm}}##.

Is this what you were looking for?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy, PeroK, Lnewqban and 1 other person
String theory guy said:
Sorry I was not clear. I would like to understand how to solve this problem without using polar coordinate's.
None of the replies mention polar coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: String theory guy and PeroK
kuruman said:
This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
Well, it is at least a symmetry argument that people have mentioned. I see three approaches via symmetry. There may be more.

@haruspex uses a symmetric pairing argument show that the COM is the average of a bunch of zero vectors.

One can do as you suggest and use bilateral symmetry in one dimension to get the x coordinate of the COM and then in the orthogonal dimension to get the y coordinate of the COM, both of which must be zero.

Or one can do as @PeroK seems to suggest and simply observe that by rotational symmetry, there is no preferred direction. So the COM, if any, can only be at the center. That one fits my personal sense of mathematical aesthetics best.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, hutchphd and String theory guy
kuruman said:
Start with the definition of the x-position of the CM relative to the center, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{1}{M}\int x~dm=\frac{1}{M}\int x~\lambda ds$$ where ##ds## is an arc element ##ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}.##
Now $$x^2+y^2=R^2\implies xdx+ydy=0\implies dy=-\frac{xdx}{y}.$$Therefore $$ds=\sqrt{dx^2+\frac{x^2 dx^2}{y^2}}=dx\sqrt{\frac{x^2+y^2}{y^2}}=R\frac{dx}{|y|}.$$Thus if we integrate over a semicircle from the 3 o'clock position to the 9 o'clock position, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{|y|}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{\sqrt{R^2-x^2}}.$$At this point you can
  1. Observe that you have an odd function integrated over symmetric limits which means that it vanishes. This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
  2. Actually do the integral and verify that it vanishes. Let ##u^2=R^2-x^2##, etc. etc.
Obviously, the integral that completes the circle from the 9 o'clock position to the 3 o'clock position also vanishes and so do the integrals for ##Y_{\text{cm}}##.

Is this what you were looking for?
Yep, Thank You.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K