Calculating the expected value of a dice roll

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Addez123
Messages
199
Reaction score
21
Homework Statement
In a boardgame you move forward the amount of steps that the dice roll. Except if the dice show 1 you move 6 steps. Calculate the Expected Value.
Relevant Equations
E(x) = sum(g(k) * p(k))
I write p(k) as:
$$p(k) = 1/6, k = 2,3,4,5$$
$$p(k) = 2/6, k = 6$$

Is that wrong?
Because then the expected value becomes
$$1/6 * 4 + 2/6 * 6 = 8/3$$

While my book says 11/3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Addez123 said:
Homework Statement:: In a boardgame you move forward the amount of steps that the dice roll. Except if the dice show 1 you move 6 steps. Calculate the Expected Value.
Relevant Equations:: E(x) = sum(g(k) * p(k))

I write p(k) as:
$$p(k) = 1/6, k = 2,3,4,5$$
$$p(k) = 2/6, k = 6$$

Is that wrong?
Because then the expected value becomes
$$1/6 * 4 + 2/6 * 6 = 8/3$$

While my book says 11/3
Well, ##8/3 < 3##, which is less than you'd expect if ##1## counted as ##1## and not ##6##.

Your problem seems to be that you didn't count throws of ##2,3## or ##5##.
 
Addez123 said:
$$p(k) = 1/6, k = 2,3,4,5$$
$$p(k) = 2/6, k = 6$$
Is that wrong?
Because then the expected value becomes
$$1/6 * 4 + 2/6 * 6 = 8/3$$
No, it doesn’t become that.
In your last step, you multiplied the 1/6 by the number of cases with that probability, not by the number of steps taken in those cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Addez123
Ah yea that was why!
Should've calculated 1/6*2 + 1/6 * 3 etc.