MHB Calculating the Height of a Trapezium Using Given Side Lengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of the trapezium with bases AB = (x + 3) cm and DC = (2x − 3) cm, the area formula A = 1/2 * (a + b) * h is used, where A is 15 cm². Rearranging the formula allows for the height h to be expressed in terms of x. The next step involves substituting the values of the bases into the area equation to derive an expression for h. This approach will facilitate solving for the height based on the given side lengths. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the area formula to find the height.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
View attachment 5786

AB = (x + 3) cm, DC = (2x − 3) cm and BE = EC.

area of the trapezium is 15 cm^2 \therefore,(x + 3) (2x − 3) or ? i think you should find the are and use the squarootcan you help me to proceed.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6.8 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
AB = (x + 3) cm, DC = (2x − 3) cm and BE = EC.

area of the trapezium is 15 cm^2 \therefore,(x + 3) (2x − 3) or ? i think you should find the are and use the squarootcan you help me to proceed.

Not even close.

The formula for the area of a trapezium is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} A = \frac{1}{2}\,\left( a + b \right) \,h \end{align*}$, where a and b are the parallel sides and h is the height.

Can you get an expression for the height in terms of x?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top