I Calculating the odds of drawing 3 "no" notes from a hat with 3 "no" and 3 "yes" notes

AI Thread Summary
The probability of drawing three "no" notes consecutively from a hat containing three "no" and three "yes" notes is calculated as 1/20 for one person. When both individuals draw three "no" notes in succession, the combined probability becomes 1/400. The discussion highlights the surprising nature of this outcome, suggesting that the perceived significance of the event may overshadow the mathematical odds. Participants express amazement at the result, emphasizing the emotional impact rather than just the statistical analysis. Overall, the probability calculation provides a clear understanding of the odds involved in this scenario.
Forwardbite1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
My wife and I would like to know what the odds are of a "hat draw" we did this past week.
Hello All,

I would like to find out what the percentage is of what happened to us in a drawing - quite amazing and would like to know what the percentage is in doing this.

My wife and I were looking into starting another business but it looked like we were getting roadblocked at every turn. My wife had an idea and thought we should draw out of a hat to let us know if we were to go ahead with this new business by her and I drawing the same answer in each of our (3) draws - (6) draws total.

She put (3) pieces of paper in a hat that had "yes" on them, and she put (3) pieces of paper in the hat that had "no" on them.

My wife drew (3) times and got "no" on all (3) draws.

**Keep in mind that after each of her (3) draws, the piece of paper she drew was NOT put back into the hat. It was set aside on the counter. In other words, prior to her first draw, there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and (3) "no" pieces of paper in the hat. After her first draw there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and only (2) "no" pieces of paper in the hat. After her second draw there were (3) "yes" pieces of paper and only (1) "no" piece of paper in the hat. When I drew, I used the same method of setting the piece of paper that I drew to the side before doing my next draw.

My wife drew (3) "no" pieces of paper. The (3) "no" pieces of paper were then put back in the hat and I then I also drew (3) "no" pieces of paper, while also using the same method of setting aside the drawn piece of paper on the counter and not back in the hat. Each draw having varying odds since the drawn piece of paper was not put back in the hat. Also, not sure if this would be somehow calculated, but we did also draw (6) "no" in a row.

Could someone please calculate what the percentage is of this happening? I hope I've provided enough info for someone (someone much better at math than me! Ha!), but feel free to let me know if any additional info is needed for this calc..

Thank You!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not a whit, we defy augury. Hamlet

The probability of drawing all three "no" is ##\frac 3 6 \times \frac 2 5 \times \frac 1 4 = \frac 1 {20}##. The probability of both doing it is, therefore, ##\frac 1 {400}##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Albertus Magnus, FactChecker and berkeman
One important thing to note for statistical purposes, you would be here making the same thread and asking the same question if you both got all yesses so I think PeroK's answer, while correct, underestimates the important thing which is the probability that you are amazed by what happened and think it has cosmic meaning.
 
We got the answer we were looking for (1/400), and thank you for providing this answer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top