Calculating the Radius of a Circle for Masses Attached by a Cord

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScienceGeek24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the radius of a circular path for a mass (m1 = 2 kg) moving on a frictionless table, while a second mass (m2 = 4 kg) hangs vertically. The speed of m1 is given as 3.5 m/s, and the system is in equilibrium with m2 remaining at rest. The relevant equations include T = mv²/r for m1 and Mg - t = Mv²/r for m2. The solution requires correctly applying these equations to find the radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with circular motion dynamics
  • Knowledge of tension in cords and forces acting on masses
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of centripetal force in circular motion
  • Learn how to derive equations for tension in connected mass systems
  • Study examples of equilibrium in systems involving pulleys and cords
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple masses and circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of circular motion and tension in systems.

ScienceGeek24
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m1=2kg is attached to a cord. The cord goes down through a hole in the table and is attached to mass m2=4 kg hanging below the table. The 2 kg mass moves on the table in a circle at a speed of 3.5 m/s the table top is friction less and there is no friction between the cord and the side of the hole. What is the radius of the circle if the 4 kg mass remains at rest?

Homework Equations



Sum of force x direction m1: T=mv^2/r

Sum of forces y direction m1: N-mg=mv^2/r

Sum of forces x direction m2: Mg-t= Mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to use this equations and i cannot come up wit the solution. Do i have my equation correctly in this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you use orbital length to get the answer :P
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K