I Calculating the Raleigh Criterion constant to 99 significant figures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Rayleigh criterion constant to 99 significant figures using the Bessel function of the first kind. The user initially attempted to use HiPER Calc Pro for integration but found it inadequate, while the HP Prime G2 provided a result to only 12 significant figures. A more precise value for the Rayleigh criterion constant was derived from an alternative method, yielding 1.21966989126650445492653884746525517787935933077511212945638126557694328028076014425087191879391333. Participants noted that the Rayleigh criterion is more of a rule of thumb for lens resolution and that extreme precision may not be necessary for practical applications. The conversation highlights the balance between mathematical rigor and real-world applicability in optical physics.
Jenab2
Messages
85
Reaction score
22
I set about trying to use HiPER Calc Pro on my phone to solve the integral for the Bessel function of the first kind and of order one, so that I could get the ordinate value for the first root of the function to 99 significant figures, then divide that by π to 99 significant figures, in order to get the Raleigh criterion constant to 99 significant figures. But then I discovered that the HiPER Calc Pro won't do the integration.

In general,

Jɴ(x) = (1/π) ∫(0,π) cos[Nt − x sin t] dt − [sin(Nπ)/π] ∫(0,∞) exp[−x sinh t − Nt] dt

However, for any integer value of N, sin(Nπ) = 0.

And so, when N is an integer, you can just solve the former term,

Jɴ(x) = (1/π) ∫(0,π) cos[Nt − x sin t] dt

And, in this case, it happens that N=1. Then you find the least positive value for x for which J₁(x) = 0.

The HP Prime G2 will solve this integral, and, to 12 significant figures, the Raleigh criterion constant is 1.21966989127. But that's as much precision as I can get from the HP Prime G2.

The Raleigh criterion (or Dawes limit) is the minimum angular size or separation, θᵣ , that can be resolved by a telescope having a circular aperture of diameter D, at wavelength λ, where D and λ have the same length units. The equation for the Raleigh criterion is

sin θᵣ = 1.21966989127 λ/D

I found another way to solve the Bessel function of the first kind for integer orders.

Jɴ(x) = Σ(k=0,∞) (−1)ᵏ (x/2)ᴺ⁺²ᵏ / [(N+k)! k!]

and

J₁(3.831705970207512315614435886308160766564545274287801928762298989918839309519011470214112874757423127) = 0.

That argument, divided by π, is the Raleigh criterion constant to 99 significant digits:

1.21966989126650445492653884746525517787935933077511212945638126557694328028076014425087191879391333
 
Science news on Phys.org
This is probably an issue with hiper calc and its internal 100 digit limitation for any number. If instead you had wanted say 50 digit precision it probably would work.
 
tech99 said:
I don't think there is any actual need for precision with this constant.
You are absolutely right. The Raylieigh Criterion is very much an arbitrary rule of thumb for predicting the resolving power of a lens system (it assumes circulat symmetry and a flat field etc etc.). It basically tells you when the dip in brightness patterns of two (equally bright) point sources is half the power of the two maxima. that is considered to be the 'best you can do' but we all know that, with a bit of care (plus some number crunching), you can do a lot better than that. The real limit is down to the brightnesses of the two sources relative to the background brightness (i.e. signal to noise) so a couple of sig figs should be enough.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top