Calculating the Schmid factor for an FCC single crystal

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jbrown110
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal Fcc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Schmid factor for an FCC single crystal when oriented with its [100] direction parallel to the loading axis. It involves theoretical aspects of crystallography and material science, particularly focusing on the resolved shear stress and the geometry of slip systems in FCC crystals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the formula for the Schmid factor as "cos(φ)*cos(λ)" and describes the relevant slip planes and directions for FCC crystals.
  • The same participant calculates the angle φ between the <111> direction and the loading direction <100>, arriving at a value of 1/√3.
  • The participant also calculates the angle λ between the loading direction <100> and a slip direction <01-1>, finding it to be π/2.
  • Another participant points out that the chosen slip direction does not lie within the slip plane, suggesting it would be problematic for obtaining slip.
  • The original poster acknowledges the mistake and reworks the problem using the correct slip directions, which yield the expected answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for correct slip direction selection in calculating the Schmid factor, but there was an initial misunderstanding regarding the appropriate slip direction.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of correctly identifying slip directions and planes in FCC crystals, which may depend on specific definitions and assumptions about crystal orientation.

jbrown110
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The problem said:
"Determine the magnitude of the Schmid factor for an FCC single crystal oriented with its [100] direction parallel to the loading axis. "

The Schmid factor is the

"cos(\phi)*cos(\lambda)"

term in the equation for resolved shear stress.

I know that the slip planes for an FCC single crystal are the four {111} planes, and the slip directions are the three <110> directions inside each of the {111} planes.

To solve for \phi, the angle between the <111> direction and the loading direction, <100>, I said that it was equal to

Cos^{-1}((1*1+1*0+1*0)/\sqrt{(1^2+1^2+1^2)*(1^2)})

That comes out to 1/\sqrt{3}

And using the same equation, I found that \lambda, the angle between the loading direction, <100>, and the slip direction, <01-1>, is \pi/2

Multiplying \phi and \lambda should have given me the schmid factor, according to my textbook, but I couldn't get the right answer.

The answer is .408, but I kept getting something different and I'm not sure why. If some one could explain this to me, I would be very grateful. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jbrown110, welcome to PF. Your slip direction doesn't lie within your slip plane. You're going to have a hard time obtaining slip that way. :smile:
 
So, basically I picked the one direction that doesn't work for the [111] plane. haha

I reworked it with the other two possible slip directions and they both gave the right answer.

Thanks for the reply.
 
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K