Calculating the Speed Needed for a Successful Motorcycle Jump Across a River

  • Thread starter Thread starter tentoes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Motorcycle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the necessary speed for a motorcyclist to successfully jump across a 40.0m wide river with a takeoff ramp inclined at 53 degrees and a height difference of 15.0m. The correct initial speed required at the top of the ramp is determined to be 17.8m/s, contrasting with the incorrect calculation of 10.61m/s. The error in calculations primarily stems from misapplication of the equations of motion, particularly in the x and y directions, and misunderstanding the relationship between average velocity and initial velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for motion
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations
  • Learn about the effects of angle and height in projectile jumps
  • Explore the relationship between average velocity and initial velocity in physics
  • Practice solving similar problems involving inclined ramps and height differences
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone interested in the mechanics of motorcycle jumps or similar physical scenarios.

tentoes
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Problem: A motorcyclist is about to jump across a river. The takeoff ramp is inclined at 53 degrees above the horizontal, the river is 40.0m wide, and the far bank is 15.0m lower than the top of the ramp. Ignore air resistance. What must the motorcyclist's speed be at the top of the ramp in order to just make it to the edge of the far bank?
So I know that in the x-direction: a=0, v=initial velocity * cos(53), position=Vi*cos(53)*t
and in the y direction: a=-9.8, V=-9.8*t+Vi*sin(53), position = -4.8t^2+Vi*sin(53)+15 (if "origin" here is (0, 15).So I'm missing time and initial velocity, but the equation for velocity in the x direction doesn't have t in it, so I know V=40/t, and so Vi=40/(t*cos(53)). Then I can plug that equation in for Vi in the y-position equation and solve for t (so I have t= √(((40*sin(53)/cos(53))+15)/4.8) so t=3.77 seconds, and plug that value into either velocity equation, and I get 10.61m/s. Only problem is, this is the wrong answer, and the correct one is 17.8m/s - so where am I going wrong here? I've looked at a couple of explanations of this problem not involving an overall change in y and I understand why this should work, but I've redone and gone over the problem multiple times now and there is no 17.8m/s to be found!

so I have t= √(((40*sin(53)/cos(53))+15)/4.8
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correction - because I get (40*sin(53)*t)/cos(53)*t, the t's cancel so I didn't use my calculator, I used algebra. Which is generally where my errors enter!
 
4.9 m/s² ... and I think your velocity term didn't get its sign reversed.
 
Oops on the 4.9 - but even changing that my answer is still far from correct. Which velocity term do you mean? -4.9t^2 just goes on the other side and become positive so all terms are positive.
 
tentoes said:
so t=3.77 seconds, and plug that value into either velocity equation, and I get 10.61m/s.
I get t = 3.73, but even if I take t=3.77 and plug it into your Vi*cos(53)*t equation I get a number quite close to the answer. Please post all your working.
 
Aha! It's my algebra. I was using the original Vx = 40/t, but NOT using the entire expression, which is (40/t)/cos(53) = 17.63 I guess 40/t gives you the average velocity, but that is not equal to the initial velocity - right? I also tried plugging in t=3.77 back into the Vy equation, but I got a huge number - I'm not sure exactly why that wouldn't work, except that t=3.77 is the "zero" of that equation.

Thanks for your help - hopefully now that I know where I went wrong this type of question will seem as easy as it should be (since we're moving rapidly past this type of problem in class now.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K