What Launch Angle Does an Archer Fish Need to Hit Its Target?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the launch angle required for an archer fish to hit an insect with a water drop, considering the physics of projectile motion. The fish observes the insect at a specific angle and distance, and the challenge lies in calculating the appropriate launch angle for the drop to intersect the insect's position at the peak of its parabolic trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of trigonometric relationships to find initial vertical and horizontal distances. There are attempts to relate time and velocity components to the launch angle. Some participants suggest avoiding quadratic equations by expressing the answer in terms of initial velocity components instead of speed and angle.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various methods to approach the problem, including using conservation of energy and kinematic equations. There is a productive exchange regarding the relationship between vertical and horizontal components of velocity, and some guidance has been offered on how to derive these components from known values.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of constraints such as the need to express answers in terms of variables before substituting numerical values, and the discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the initial velocities and their calculation from the maximum height and range of the water.

Swansong
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Upon spotting an insect on a twig overhanging water, an archer fish squirts water drops at the insect to knock it into the water (Fig. 4 -38). Although the fish sees the insect along a straight-line path at angle f and distance d, a drop must be launched at a different angle θ if its parabolic path is to intersect the insect. If φ= 36.0° and d 0.900 m, what launch angle (theta) is required for the drop to be at the top of the parabolic path when it reaches the insect?
2. Relevant equation
So the two equations i have used so far are, y-yi=vi*sin(θ)-.5gt^2, x-xi=vi*cos(θ).

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, I found both xi and yi by using the trigonometric relationships. .9sin(φ)=.53 and .9cos(φ)=.73 for the vertical and horizontal distances. This yields the maximum height and distance from the initial position to the insect. I substituted .53 into the horizontal distance equation which gave me .73/(vi*cos(θ))= t, which i then substituted into the vertical distance equation. This is the part where I am stuck. After simplifying the equation, i am left with two unknown variables, vi and θ. 0= (-3.577*vi^2-.53)+tan(θ)-3.577vi^2*tan^2(θ). Should I solve the quadratic equation for θ and go from there?? p.s Sorry that I didn't use LaTeX, I'm not very comfortable with it, since I've never used it before, but i will try to use it in my following posts.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-09-12 at 9.32.44 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-09-12 at 9.32.44 PM.png
    67.3 KB · Views: 674
Physics news on Phys.org
Swansong said:

Homework Statement


Upon spotting an insect on a twig overhanging water, an archer fish squirts water drops at the insect to knock it into the water (Fig. 4 -38). Although the fish sees the insect along a straight-line path at angle f and distance d, a drop must be launched at a different angle θ if its parabolic path is to intersect the insect. If φ= 36.0° and d 0.900 m, what launch angle (theta) is required for the drop to be at the top of the parabolic path when it reaches the insect?
2. Relevant equation
So the two equations i have used so far are, y-yi=vi*sin(θ)-.5gt^2, x-xi=vi*cos(θ).

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, I found both xi and yi by using the trigonometric relationships. .9sin(φ)=.53 and .9cos(φ)=.73 for the vertical and horizontal distances. This yields the maximum height and distance from the initial position to the insect. I substituted .53 into the horizontal distance equation which gave me .73/(vi*cos(θ))= t, which i then substituted into the vertical distance equation. This is the part where I am stuck. After simplifying the equation, i am left with two unknown variables, vi and θ. 0= (-3.577*vi^2-.53)+tan(θ)-3.577vi^2*tan^2(θ). Should I solve the quadratic equation for θ and go from there?? p.s Sorry that I didn't use LaTeX, I'm not very comfortable with it, since I've never used it before, but i will try to use it in my following posts.
Try solving for time, then you should be able to solve for vi.
 
It's good practice to find the final answer in terms of the variables (D and Φ) and wait until the end to plug in the given values.

It may be easier to work with the initial components of velocity (Vx, Vy) instead of the speed/angle (Vi, θ). Quadratic equations can be avoided and the answer can be found as θ=arctan(Vy/Vx)
 
Nathanael said:
It's good practice to find the final answer in terms of the variables (D and Φ) and wait until the end to plug in the given values.

It may be easier to work with the initial components of velocity (Vx, Vy) instead of the speed/angle (Vi, θ). Quadratic equations can be avoided and the answer can be found as θ=arctan(Vy/Vx)
How would i work with these initial components for this problem? wouldn't i still need to know initial velocity in this case?
 
Swansong said:
How would i work with these initial components for this problem? wouldn't i still need to know initial velocity in this case?
You know the maximum height the water reaches, right? You can use this to determine the initial vertical velocity Vy.

In the time it takes the water to reach that height, you know how far horizontally it has moved. So then you can determine Vx that way.
 
yes, I know the maximum height and range of the water. But I do not see how i can get the initial velocities from this. Are you referring to the equations, Xf=Vi*t*cos(θ) and Yf=Vi*t*sin(θ)-.5gt^2? Still kind of confused, sorry
 
Sorry I did not mean to be confusing, it just seemed like a simpler method.

Vy can be found from conservation of energy; or it can be found from the kinematics equation ##y=V_yT-0.5gT^2## where T is the time it takes to reach the top of it's path, (a.k.a. the time for Vy to decrease to zero, which is the T that satisfies the equation Vy-gT=0).

To find Vx you will use the same time T in the horizontal distance equation.
 
Nathanael said:
Sorry I did not mean to be confusing, it just seemed like a simpler method.

Vy can be found from conservation of energy; or it can be found from the kinematics equation ##y=V_yT-0.5gT^2## where T is the time it takes to reach the top of it's path, (a.k.a. the time for Vy to decrease to zero, which is the T that satisfies the equation Vy-gT=0).

To find Vx you will use the same time T in the horizontal distance equation.
ohh, alright. Completely makes sense that way. Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K