Calculating the Speed of an Object Launched by a Spring Catapult

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of an object launched by a spring catapult, utilizing the principles of energy conservation. The formula derived for horizontal launch speed is v=√(k(L-s)^2/m), where k is the spring constant, L is the extended length, s is the natural length, and m is the mass of the object. For vertical launches, the adjusted formula incorporates gravitational potential energy, resulting in v=√[k(L-s)^2-2mg(L-s)]/√m. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between extension length and total length in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic principles of kinetic and potential energy
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its effects on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced applications of Hooke's Law in mechanical systems
  • Study the effects of mass and spring constant on launch speed
  • Investigate energy conservation in different types of projectile motion
  • Learn about the dynamics of vertical launches and gravitational effects
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and hobbyists interested in the mechanics of spring-powered devices and projectile motion calculations.

johnsholto
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A spring catapult consists of a massless spring and a massless cup. An object of a certain mass is loaded into the cup, the spring is extended to a length L, and the object is launched horizontally.

What is the speed of the object?

s is the natural length of the spring, L is the length the spring was extended to. their difference is the extension length x

E=0.5mv^2 and E=0.5kx^2 -> v=√(k(L-s)^2/m)

Now what about vertically? I assume that the speed would be less since there is the gravitational potential that changes as the spring returns to its natural length. Might the answer then be:

E=0.5mv^2 and E=0.5kx^2-mg(L-s) -> v=√[k(L-s)^2-2mg(L-s)]/√m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct but why not use x instead of L-s? Also, I would remove sqrt(m) from denominator as it makes the expression easier to dedipher.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K