Calculating the Spring Constant k of a Spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant k of a spring based on the work done to stretch it, as well as analyzing the kinetic energy of a roller coaster car in relation to gravitational potential energy and work done against friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various formulas related to spring mechanics and energy conservation, including F=-kx and PE=1/2kx^2, while questioning their applicability to the problems presented.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted calculations using different approaches, with guidance offered regarding the correct relationships between work, potential energy, and kinetic energy. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of friction on energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the correct application of formulas and the impact of friction on energy calculations, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts.

jimithing71
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
To stretch a spring a distance of 0.20m 30J of work is done. What is the value of the spring constant k of the spring?
a)6 b)30 c)150 d)1500 e)none of the above



I know that the answer is D 1500 but I can't quite arrive at that.



The two formulas I thought to try were F=-kx and PE=1/2kx^2 but those didn't work. Then, after a bit of perusing on here I found k=mg/x.
Thus, 30(9.8)/.20 = 1470 ...which is close to 1500 but is that correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimithing71 said:
The two formulas I thought to try were F=-kx and PE=1/2kx^2 but those didn't work.
Try again. Note that these formulas are for very different things. Only one of them relates to work/energy.
Then, after a bit of perusing on here I found k=mg/x.
Nah.
 
My head is starting to hurt! LOL!

Okay, so now I tried F=-kx, 30J=-k(.20m), 30J/.20m=-k, 150=k

That is one of the options (C), but our instructor told us the answer was (D) 1500. ?
 
jimithing71 said:
My head is starting to hurt! LOL!

Okay, so now I tried F=-kx, 30J=-k(.20m), 30J/.20m=-k, 150=k

That is one of the options (C), but our instructor told us the answer was (D) 1500. ?
You picked the wrong equation. F is force, not work. (PE is energy/work)

One more time.
 
Thank you! PE=1/2kx^6, 30=1/2k(.04), 30/.04=1/2k(.04)/.04, 750=1/2k, 1500=k Whew!

One more?

A roller coaster car with a mass of 900kg starts at rest from a point 20m above ground. At point B it is 12m above ground. If the initial KE was 0 and the work done against friction between the starting point and point B is 30,000J, what is the KE at point B?
a)10.8kJ b)20kJ c)30dj d)40kJ e) none of the above.

I know the answer is 40 kJ but I'm not sure which equation to use at all. The only one in my notes that seems close is KE=1/2mv^2 but that isn't working.
 
jimithing71 said:
The only one in my notes that seems close is KE=1/2mv^2 but that isn't working.
You need to worry about total mechanical energy: KE + PE. What's the formula for gravitational PE?
 
G=6.67X10^-11* N*m^2/kg^2 ??
 
Or wait! Is it PE=mgh??
 
yes it is
 
  • #10
cupid.callin said:
yes it is

Which one?
 
  • #11
jimithing71 said:
Or wait! Is it PE=mgh??
That's the one.
 
  • #12
Sorry but I don't get that at ALL! That would be PE=(900kg)(9.8g)(20m), PE= 176,400? What am I missing?
 
  • #13
jimithing71 said:
Sorry but I don't get that at ALL! That would be PE=(900kg)(9.8g)(20m), PE= 176,400? What am I missing?
You need to compare total mechanical energy at the starting point to that at point B. What happens to the total mechanical energy because of friction?
 
  • #14
It would be slowed due to friction? I am really lost on this one. I did the PE=mgh for point A and for point B and subtracted the two and got 70,560 so obviously that is wrong as well.
 
  • #15
jimithing71 said:
It would be slowed due to friction? I am really lost on this one. I did the PE=mgh for point A and for point B and subtracted the two and got 70,560 so obviously that is wrong as well.
Hint: If there were no friction, then:

KEA + PEA = KEB + PEB

How would you have to modify this to incorporate the energy lost to friction?
 
  • #16
I wish I knew!

Okay, last attempt:
KE(a) + PE(a) = KE(b) + PE(b)
0 + 176,400 = KE(b) + 105,840 + 30,000
176,400 - 105,840 - 30,000 = KE(b)
40,560 = KE(b)

?
 
  • #17
jimithing71 said:
I wish I knew!

Okay, last attempt:
KE(a) + PE(a) = KE(b) + PE(b)
0 + 176,400 = KE(b) + 105,840 + 30,000
176,400 - 105,840 - 30,000 = KE(b)
40,560 = KE(b)

?
Looks OK to me. One of the answer choices is pretty close.
 
  • #18
Is that it?
 
  • #19
jimithing71 said:
Is that it?
Yep. (Round off to one significant figure.)
 
  • #20
LOVE YOU Doc Al! Thanks for all your help! Time for a glass of vino! :0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K