Calculating the Time and Height of Falling Stones: A Kinematics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling stones
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving two stones: one dropped from a building and another thrown at 30 m/s two seconds later. The key equations derived include the kinematic equations for both stones, leading to the conclusion that the time it takes for the first stone to reach the ground is 3.88 seconds. The height of the building can be calculated using this time, and the maximum velocities of both stones just before impact can also be determined. The quadratic formula is essential for solving the equations, although the problem simplifies to a linear equation after canceling terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula
  • Basic knowledge of acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations
  • Learn how to apply the quadratic formula in physics problems
  • Explore concepts of free fall and projectile motion
  • Investigate how to calculate maximum velocity in free-fall scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in solving motion-related problems in mechanics.

Matt
Ok, so there are two stones. One is dropped (not thrown) off a building. 2 seconds later a rock is thrown at 30 m/s. The rocks hit the ground at the same time. Here's what I have so far:

R1:

v0 = 0 m/s
T = unknown
x = o m
x0 = unknown
a = 9.8 m/s^2

R2:

v0 = 30 m/s
T = Time of R1 - 2 s
x = o m
x0 = unknown
a = 30 m/s @ 9.80 m/s^2

I know that these two equations must equal each other:

(.5)(9.80 m/s^2)(T)^s = (30m/s)(T-2) + (.5)(9.80m/s^2)(T-2)^2

However, I have expanded this a million times and for some reason I can't get things to click. I mean, I could do guess and check but there has got to be an easier way...

The question asks how long it took the first stone to reach the gound, how high the building is, and what speeds the stones are at before they hit the ground.

Since they ask for the time first, I thought I would have to use the 2nd kinematic equation. But then I realized that I don't know what the initial height was. I feel stuck because I have these two variables the initial height and time. What do I use to find these one at a time? Lol, I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Matt
(.5)(9.80 m/s^2)(T)^s = (30m/s)(T-2) + (.5)(9.80m/s^2)(T-2)^2

However, I have expanded this a million times and for some reason I can't get things to click. I mean, I could do guess and check but there has got to be an easier way...

There is an easy way: The quadratic formula.

Expand out the square, and you'll see that you have a simple quadratic polynomial. You can then solve by:

x=(-b±(b2-4ac)1/2)/2a
 
Comes down to simplfied before plugging into equation:

(-19.6 m/s^2)T + (30 m/s)T + (19.6 m/s^2) - (60 m/s)

How does this follow std form?
 
You messed up somewhere, because you should have a "T2" term in there. Slow down and have another crack at it.
 
(-19.6 m/s^2)T + (30 m/s)T + (19.6 m/s^2) - (60 m/s)

You clearly mean T2 in the first term because you will need seconds squared to cancel the s^2 term in -19.6 m/s^2.

For the same reason "(19.6 m/s^2)- (60 m/s)" is impossible- you can't add (or subtract) velocity and acceleration.

Finally, to solve an equation, you have to have an equation! What is this supposed to be equal to?
 
Ok, I was looking at my physics book a little more...

You can find time with the quadratic equation with this equation...

y = y0 + v0t + .5at^2

However, you cannot solve for time with this method unless you have all the information except time. In my case, this is what I have for the second stone:

x = 0
x0 = unknown
t = unknown
a = 9.80 m/s
v0 = 30 m/s (it was thrown not dropped)

Due the fact that there are two unknowns I cannot solve with the quadratic. The other stone, which was dropped, must be included in the mix somewhere - it has to be a two part problem that I can't see.

First stone:

x = 0
x0 = unknown
t = unknown
a = 9.0 m/s^2
v0 = 0 m/s

If you think about it these two equations must equal each other if the two rocks hit the ground at the same time:

(.5)(9.80 m/s^2)(T)^2 = (30m/s)(T-2) + (.5)(9.80m/s^2)(T-2)^2

I have the actual answer, its in the back of the book, and if you plug the time into it, the equations equal each other. However, I have expanded this equation a million times. the (4.90 m/s^2)T^2 always cancels out (which doesn't give rise to std form for the quadratic equation. I'm really stuck guys and gals.
 
Okay, your equation is:

4.9T2= 4.9(T-2)2+ 30(T-2)

multipling that out:

4.9T2= 4.9(T2- 4T+ 4)+ 30T- 60
= 4.9T2- 19.6T+ 19.6+ 30T- 60

The "4.9T2" terms on both sides cancel! We don't have a quadratic equation after all!

We do have, after we move the terms involving T to one side,
we have 30T- 19.6T= 60- 19.6 or 10.4T= 40.4 so T= 40.4/10.4= 3.88 seconds. Now, you can use that value of T to find the height of the building.
 
Is it ok that you neglected units like that? Like m/s^s and m/s and s?
 
Well, I guess you can, because according to the book that answer is correct. It was easy to find the height based off of this, but what does "what speeds the stones are at before they hit the ground" mean? "Just before" could be ay any point couldn't it?
 
  • #10
Oh wait I understand it now, when they say right before they mean the maximum velocity of the first and second stones. That is a stupid way for the book to word it, lol.
 
  • #11
First, I didn't need to carry the units along because I had checked them and knew they were correct.

Second, any time a textbook seems to word something in a "stupid way" look again- you might learn something. (I'm not saying it CAN'T be stupid- just that authors (and editors) tend to be very careful about wording.)

In this case, if they had said "maximum velocity" that would have been assuming things not yet given. The point of "just before" (I notice you say "before they hit the ground" and "just before"- which was it?) is that you can use the time you have already calculated for hitting the ground. AT the time they hit the ground they start decellerating rapidly so that would be ambiguous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K