Calculating the Volume of a Diamond Unit Cell

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the volume per unit cell for the diamond structure, focusing on the relationship between the atomic radius and the edge length of the unit cell. Participants explore different approaches to derive the edge length and clarify the geometric relationships within the structure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the calculation of the unit cell volume and the derivation of the edge length, proposing a relationship based on the face diagonal of the cube.
  • Another participant corrects the first by indicating that the closest atoms in the diamond structure are not on the face of the fcc cell, but rather a corner atom and an atom inside the cell, leading to a distance of 2r.
  • A subsequent reply attempts to derive the edge length using a different approach, but arrives at an incorrect conclusion, questioning the origin of the factor of √3 in the correct expression for the edge length.
  • Another participant points out a misunderstanding regarding the use of the Pythagorean theorem, suggesting that the diagonal of a cube differs from that of a square.
  • The initial poster acknowledges the mistake in their approach after receiving clarification and successfully finds the correct solution using the three-dimensional Pythagorean theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial calculations, but there is agreement on the correct geometric relationships after clarifications are made. The discussion reflects a mix of misunderstandings and corrections without a definitive resolution on the initial confusion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' calculations depend on specific geometric interpretations, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the application of the Pythagorean theorem in three dimensions. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving relationships in crystal structures.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
I have some difficulty understanding how the volume per unit cell for the diamond structure is calculated.

I've seen in various websites that this volume is:

##v=a^3 = \left( \frac{8r}{\sqrt{3}} \right)^3##

Here ##r## is the radius of an atom. But how did they work out ##a## (the edge of the cube)? :confused:

Here is a picture of the structure.

The unit cell has 8 atoms as:

##8 \times \frac{1}{8} + 6 \times \frac{1}{2} + 4 = 8##

But to work out ##a##, I've simply considered one of the faces, in this case the top face of the diagram which looks like a fcc structure.

The diagonal would then be 4r, hence using Pythagoras

##4r = \sqrt{2}a \implies a = 2 \sqrt{2} r##

But my answer is not correct. Any help with this problem is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two closest atoms in the diamond structure aren't the two on the face of the fcc cell, it's the one in the corner and the one it's nearest inside the cell. See the purple bond in your picture. That distance is 2r.
 
daveyrocket said:
The two closest atoms in the diamond structure aren't the two on the face of the fcc cell, it's the one in the corner and the one it's nearest inside the cell. See the purple bond in your picture. That distance is 2r.

Thank you for your input. But in that case I will get

##d=8r##

##8r=\sqrt{a^2+a^2} = \sqrt{2} a##

##\therefore a= \frac{8r}{\sqrt{2}} = 4 \sqrt{2} r##

But this is wrong as the answer must be 8r/√3. Where did the ##\sqrt{3}## come from? :confused:
 
I'm not sure what d is. Is that your diagonal in the cube?
You're using the wrong triangle for the Pythagorean theorem. The diagonal of a cube is not the same length as the diagonal of a square.
 
Oops, I was using the wrong formula. I used the pythagorean theorem in three dimensions and got the correct solution. Thank you so much for your help! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K