Calculating Time for Constant Acceleration: Motorcycle Velocity Change

Click For Summary
A motorcycle with a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s² needs to change its speed from 40.9 to 50.9 m/s and from 70.9 to 80.9 m/s. The kinematic equation Vf = Vi + a*t is used to calculate the time required for these changes. An initial attempt incorrectly combined terms, leading to an incorrect solution of 4.04 seconds. The correct approach involves isolating the term with time (t) before solving. Proper algebraic manipulation is essential for accurate calculations in physics problems.
Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A motorcycle has a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s2. Both the velocity and acceleration of the motorcycle point in the same direction. How much time is required for the motorcycle to change its speed from (a)40.9 to 50.9 m/s, and (b)70.9 to 80.9 m/s?
[/B]

Homework Equations


Vf = Vi + a*t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


using that kinematic formula,
for a) 50.9=40.9+2.8*t
then divide both sides by 40.9+2.8 to solve for t
answer = 4.04[/B]
and same thing with b) but in both cases the answer is coming up as wrong. what have i done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Erenjaeger said:

Homework Statement


A motorcycle has a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s2. Both the velocity and acceleration of the motorcycle point in the same direction. How much time is required for the motorcycle to change its speed from (a)40.9 to 50.9 m/s, and (b)70.9 to 80.9 m/s?
[/B]

Homework Equations


Vf = Vi + a*t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


using that kinematic formula,
for a) 50.9=40.9+2.8*t
then divide both sides by 40.9+2.8 to solve for t
answer = 4.04[/B]
and same thing with b) but in both cases the answer is coming up as wrong. what have i done wrong?
You should check your algebra.

50.9 = 40.9 + 2.8t

is not the same thing as

50.9 = (40.9 + 2.8)t.

And for that matter, neither one gives an answer of 4.04 sec. So I'm not really sure what happened there.

(Hint, you can't just add 40.9 plus 2.8 that way. That's not the way algebra works.)
 
collinsmark said:
You should check your algebra.

50.9 = 40.9 + 2.8t

is not the same thing as

50.9 = (40.9 + 2.8)t.

And for that matter, neither one gives an answer of 4.04 sec. So I'm not really sure what happened there.

(Hint, you can't just add 40.9 plus 2.8 that way. That's not the way algebra works.)
oh right, so basically i have to get 2.8t on its own and then divide by 2.8??
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Erenjaeger said:
oh right, so basically i have to get 2.8t on its own and then divide by 2.8??
Yes, that is the correct way. :smile:
 
collinsmark said:
Yes, that is the correct way. :smile:
cool thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Kuzon and collinsmark
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
824
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
924
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K