Calculating Time to Reach Point O with Force F = kx^-2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hafid Iqbal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a particle to reach a specific point (point O) under the influence of a force described by the equation F = kx^-2. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the system, which involves concepts from classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to solve a differential equation related to the force and its implications on acceleration, velocity, and displacement. There are attempts to integrate the force to find velocity and subsequently time, with some participants questioning the correctness of the equations used and the assumptions made.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the equations involved, with some participants suggesting different approaches such as using conservation of energy or integrating with respect to different variables. Guidance has been offered on how to proceed with the integration, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method or interpretation of the equations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of the problem and the potential for confusion regarding the definitions and substitutions used in the equations. The original poster has indicated a specific form of the force, which has led to varying interpretations of how to approach the problem.

Hafid Iqbal
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/9204/fisika.jpg
How much time will elapse until this particle arrive at point O?

Edit : that force is F = kx-2 not kx2


Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like you want to solve a differential equation. The force tells you the acceleration at any time. Integrate that to get the velocity and displacement. Please try it.
 
Yes, i have had velocity. But the time is my problem, i still can't get the variable t
 
Hafid Iqbal said:
Yes, i have had velocity. But the time is my problem, i still can't get the variable t

Can you show what you have done?
 
Here it is

[URL]http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;F=m.a=m.\frac{dv}{dt}&space;\\&space;\\&space;.&space;\&space;\&space;kx^{-2}=m.\frac{dv}{dt}&space;\&space;.&space;\&space;\frac{dr}{dr}&space;=&space;m.v.\frac{dv}{dr}&space;\\&space;\\&space;.&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;k(a-r)^{-2}&space;\&space;dr=m.v&space;\&space;\&space;dv&space;\\&space;\\&space;\int_0^a&space;k(a-r)^{-2}&space;\&space;dr=&space;\int_0^{v_O}&space;m.v&space;\&space;\&space;dv&space;\\&space;\\&space;.&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\&space;\fbox{\textit{v}_O&space;=&space;\infty}​
[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is incorrect: F is a^n attractive force (pointing toward the origin), so you need x''(t)=-k/x(t)^2. Alternatively, you can work out the potential energy V associated with the force, then use conservation of (total) energy.

RGV
 
Last edited:
Actually, I think Hafid's equation is correct (Since dr=-dx).
To get further on this problem, you should leave the limits as v and r, and then integrate the right-hand side (easy), and integrate the left hand side (using trigonometric substitution).
So then you will have a function of r on the left and a function of v on the right. Then you need rearrange it to the form v.f(r)=constant
So then, you integrate both sides with respect to t (you will need to use the trigonometric substitution again), and use the limit r=a, and this will give you the time.
 
Thanks for the reply
Ray Vickson said:
This is incorrect: F is a^n attractive force (pointing toward the origin), so you need x''(t)=-k/x(t)^2. Alternatively, you can work out the potential energy V associated with the force, then use conservation of (total) energy.

RGV

BruceW said:
Actually, I think Hafid's equation is correct (Since dr=-dx).
To get further on this problem, you should leave the limits as v and r, and then integrate the right-hand side (easy), and integrate the left hand side (using trigonometric substitution).
So then you will have a function of r on the left and a function of v on the right. Then you need rearrange it to the form v.f(r)=constant
So then, you integrate both sides with respect to t (you will need to use the trigonometric substitution again), and use the limit r=a, and this will give you the time.

Which one is true? :confused:
 
Well, its true that [itex]F=-k x^{-2}[/itex] and [itex]F = m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}[/itex] so that:
[tex]m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -k x^{-2}[/tex]
But now if we use the substitution x=a-r, we get:
[tex]m \frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = k {(a-r)}^{-2}[/tex]
So your equation is correct, if we define [itex]v = \frac{dr}{dt}[/itex].
 
  • #10
Also, your equation:
[tex]\int_0^r \ k(a-r)^{-2} \ dr= \ \int_0^{v} \ m.v \ dv[/tex]
IS the equation for energy conservation. On the left, you have the integral of the force (which equals the negative change in potential energy), and on the right, you have the change in kinetic energy.

You now need to do the integration, then rewrite for v and integrate again to get the time it takes to get to r=a.
 
  • #11
Ok, thanks sir for the help... :)
 
  • #12
no worries, it is quite a tricky problem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K