Calculating total activity from decay of this sample of technetium

  • Context: Chemistry 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical kinetics Decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total activity from the decay of a sample of technetium-99m (Tc-99m). Participants explore the mathematical relationships involved in radioactive decay, specifically focusing on the definitions and calculations related to activity, decay constants, and the number of nuclei in a given mass of the sample.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the decay rate equation and expresses uncertainty about the problem's requirements.
  • Another participant clarifies that the question specifically asks for the number of disintegrations per second, emphasizing the importance of using the correct definition of activity.
  • A different participant suggests calculating the number of Tc-99m atoms in the sample and provides a hint regarding the significance of the atomic mass number.
  • One participant mentions a preference for converting mass to moles and then using Avogadro's number, indicating a common approach despite the potential for alternative methods.
  • There is a correction regarding the interpretation of how quickly the number of nuclei decays, with a participant asserting that a previous statement was incorrect.
  • Another participant notes that the original question about the source of Tc-99m is misleading, providing historical context about its discovery.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the problem and the approach to solving it. There is no consensus on the best method to calculate the activity, and some statements are contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the need for specific values, such as the mass of a single atom of Tc-99m, and the implications of using different methods for calculation. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the problem's wording and the historical context of Tc-99m's production.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in nuclear physics, particularly those studying radioactive decay and its applications in medical imaging or related fields.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Technetium has not been found in nature. It can be obtained readily as a product of uranium fission in nuclear power plants, however, and is produced in quantities of many kilograms per year. MIT Chemistry Professor Alan Davison pioneered the use of techneticum in the diagnosis of heart disease. Calculate the total activity (in disintegrations per second) caused by the decay of 0.5 microgram of ##\mathrm{^{99m}Tc}## (an excited nuclear state of ##^{99}Tc##), which has a half-life of 6.0 hours.
Relevant Equations
It is not clear to me at all what the problem is asking. The total activity is a negative exponential. That is, the rate of decay of the technetium is going down exponentially fast. 0.5mcg represents a specific number of nuclei that decay. How quickly this number of nuclei decays depends on how much of the sample it is in it represents.
This is a problem from this problem set from MIT OCW.,

Here is my reasoning about the problem, even though I don't reach any conclusion since I am not sure what is being asked.

The decay rate of the number of nuclei of technetium in our sample is

$$\frac{dN}{dt}=-k_rN=\text{activity}=A$$

$$\implies N=N_0e^{-k_rt}$$

$$\implies A=A_0e^{-k_rt}$$

where ##A_0=-k_rN_0##, ##N_0## is the initial number of nuclei, and ##A_0## is the initial activity.

The half-life is

$$t_{1/2}=-\frac{\ln{2}}{k_r}=6\text{h}$$

so

$$k_r=\frac{\ln{2}}{21600}\mathrm{s^{-1}}$$

What I don't understand is what the problem is asking exactly.

The problem statement says that 0.5mcg of technetium in an excited state decays.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is quite specific; it asks for the number of disintegrations per second (this is the definition of "activity" it gives you; don't try to work with any other) due to the decay of 0.5 ug of excited Tc. Be careful with signs; the activity is positive (it equals -dN/dt, as N goes down by 1 for each disintegration). Numerically, what you've done so far looks good, now you need to calculate N0 and dN/dt.

"How quickly this number of nuclei decays depends on how much of the sample it is in it represents."
This statement is untrue.
 
@zenterix, if you haven’t yet solved the problem, I’d like to add this.

You are being asked to find the rate of decay (activity) of a sample of Tc-99m at the moment when the remaining amount is 0.5##\mu##g.

Step 1. Calculate the number, ##N##, of Tc-99m atoms (nuclei really) in 0.5##\mu##g of Tc-99m. You will need the mass of 1 atom; if you are not given the value then you need to calculate an approximate value for yourself. (Hint: what is the significance of '99'?)

Step 2. Find the decay constant (which you call ##k_r##) - you’ve already done this.

Step 3. Use ##-\frac{dN}{dt}=k_rN=\text{activity}=A##. Note I’ve corrected the signs.

Maybe it's also worth noting that original question is inaccurate/misleading. Tc-99m was discovered as “a product of uranium fission in nuclear power plants.”. That’s not how it is “readily obtained” nowadays.
 
Steve4Physics said:
Step 1. Calculate the number, ##N##, of Tc-99m atoms (nuclei really) in 0.5##\mu##g of Tc-99m. You will need the mass of 1 atom; if you are not given the value then you need to calculate an approximate value for yourself. (Hint: what is the significance of '99'?)
Funny thing. As much as it is a perfectly correct way of doing things, my first instinct is to convert to moles using molar mass, then multiply by Avogadro number. Yes, in a way it is a bit of going around, at the same time it is always easier to follow paths you are used to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K