Calculating velocity, time, and Instantaneous speed using kinematic equations

  • Thread starter Absolutism
  • Start date
  • #1
28
0

Homework Statement



An inquisitive physics student and mountain climber climbs a 52.0-m-high cliff that overhangs a calm pool of water. He throws two stones vertically downward, 1.00 s apart, and observes that they cause a single splash. The first stone has an initial speed of 2.10 m/s.


(a) How long after release of the first stone do the two stones hit the water?


(b) What initial velocity must the second stone have if the two stones are to hit the water simultaneously?

(c) What is the speed of each stone at the instant the two stones hit the water?
first stone m/s
second stone m/s

Homework Equations



vf^2=vi^2+2a(xf-xi)
xf=xi+vi t+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to find the T

xi=52m
xf=0?
vi=2.10m/s
a=-9.81m/s^2
vf= (by the first equation) = 32m/s

I tried plugging in the result in the second equation, but it's starting not to make sense.
I was told that I have to assume the stones to have been thrown vertically but with an angle, because it wouldn't make sense otherwise, but I am having difficulty getting what that angle is, and this assignment does not include the trig functions.

Homework Statement





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
46
0
If the stones are thrown vertically downward, you can think of the angle being 90° (the angle between the positive x-axis and the negative y-axis). The horizontal component of the velocity (magnitude*cos90) = 0 and the vertical component of the velocity (magnitude*sin90) is just the original magnitude. In that aspect, this can be thought of as a 1-dimensional problem.

xi=52m
xf=0?
That would work. The distances are relative to each other; you are only interested in the difference between the distances. (The second equation can be rewritten as xf-xi=vi t+1/2at^2). You could have also, for example, set xi=0 and xf=-52.

Also, don't forget the equation vf=vi+at :wink:

Edit: If you were told that the angle wasn't 90° and you weren't given the angle, then you don't have enough information to solve the problem. Although, 90° seems plausible since the stones can be thrown vertically if the student reaches over the ledge.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
28
0
If the stones are thrown vertically downward, you can think of the angle being 90° (the angle between the positive x-axis and the negative y-axis). The horizontal component of the velocity (magnitude*cos90) = 0 and the vertical component of the velocity (magnitude*sin90) is just the original magnitude. In that aspect, this can be thought of as a 1-dimensional problem.


That would work. The distances are relative to each other; you are only interested in the difference between the distances. (The second equation can be rewritten as xf-xi=vi t+1/2at^2). You could have also, for example, set xi=0 and xf=-52.

Also, don't forget the equation vf=vi+at :wink:

Edit: If you were told that the angle wasn't 90° and you weren't given the angle, then you don't have enough information to solve the problem. Although, 90° seems plausible since the stones can be thrown vertically if the student reaches over the ledge.


So I cannot consider the acceleration as -9.81 because this isn't a free falling, right?
 
  • #4
46
0
So I cannot consider the acceleration as -9.81 because this isn't a free falling, right?
The acceleration of gravity on Earth is always -9.81m/s^2. An object speeding at 3000m/s towards the ground will feel the same -9.81m/s^2 acceleration as an object that has just been dropped. In reality, an object going at 3000m/s might be slowing down if the air resistance is large enough, but the gravitational acceleration is still -9.81m/s^2 (assuming it's close to the Earth's surface).
 
  • #5
28
0
But if the vf=32 m/s then using the second equation

32=2.10+ (-9.81)t
the t = -3.04 which isn't possible. I am not sure where I went wrong.
 
  • #6
46
0
Velocity is a vector. Since the velocity is downwards, it is negative. When you took the square root to solve for the final velocity, you wrote + instead of +/-
 

Related Threads on Calculating velocity, time, and Instantaneous speed using kinematic equations

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
967
Replies
24
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
34K
Replies
1
Views
563
Top