Calculating Work Done for Carrying Tool Boxes

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyberjupiter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done by a carpenter carrying two tool boxes with given masses over a horizontal distance. The subject area pertains to physics, specifically the concept of work in mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for work, questioning the application of gravitational force in a horizontal movement scenario. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between force, distance, and angle in the context of work done.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the work formula and the significance of the angle between force and displacement. Multiple interpretations regarding the angle in the context of horizontal movement are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of carrying objects horizontally while considering gravitational force, leading to discussions about angles and the nature of work done in this scenario.

cyberjupiter
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A carpenter is holding two tool boxes of mass 19kg and 21kg respectively. Calculate the work done to carry the tool boxes through a horizontal distance of 16m.

Homework Equations



W = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



m = 21kg + 19kg
g = 9.81ms^-2
h = 0

W = (21 + 19)(9.81)(0)
W = 0J

Is this correct? And if this is correct, would you explain why it is 0J?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for work involves the dot product of two vectors.

W = F . s

Does this give you a hint?

(Yes, your answer of 0J is correct.)
 
Last edited:
In order to do work, you must move an object with mass in the direction of a force vector.
 
So if I use W = F . s, then it would be

W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) ?
Or is it,
W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) cos 90 ?
 
cyberjupiter said:
So if I use W = F . s, then it would be

W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) ?
Or is it,
W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) cos 90 ?
this ^^^

Instead of writing the vector formula, it is often expressed as W = F s cosθ
and that's probably the best one to memorise.
 
NascentOxygen, would you tell me why the angle is 90? Shouldnt it be 0? And how about if I use sin 0? I will still get 0J.
 
cyberjupiter said:
NascentOxygen, would you tell me why the angle is 90? Shouldnt it be 0? And how about if I use sin 0? I will still get 0J.
The question just tests how easily confused you are.

The only force mentioned is weight, and it acts downwards ⇓
while the motion described is horizontal ⇒
and the angle between those two vector quantities is ... ?

You want to invent your own formula using sin 0° ? What angle in this picture is 0°?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K