Calculating Work Done for Carrying Tool Boxes

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyberjupiter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a carpenter carrying two tool boxes with masses of 19kg and 21kg over a horizontal distance of 16m. The correct formula for work, W = F . s, reveals that the work done is 0J because the vertical height (h) is 0, and the angle between the force of gravity and the direction of motion is 90 degrees. Thus, no work is performed in the horizontal direction when lifting force is not applied vertically.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle
  • Familiarity with vector mathematics
  • Knowledge of gravitational force (g = 9.81 m/s²)
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the dot product in physics
  • Learn about vector components and angles in force applications
  • Explore the concept of work in different physical contexts
  • Review scenarios where work is done against gravitational forces
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in physical systems.

cyberjupiter
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A carpenter is holding two tool boxes of mass 19kg and 21kg respectively. Calculate the work done to carry the tool boxes through a horizontal distance of 16m.

Homework Equations



W = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



m = 21kg + 19kg
g = 9.81ms^-2
h = 0

W = (21 + 19)(9.81)(0)
W = 0J

Is this correct? And if this is correct, would you explain why it is 0J?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for work involves the dot product of two vectors.

W = F . s

Does this give you a hint?

(Yes, your answer of 0J is correct.)
 
Last edited:
In order to do work, you must move an object with mass in the direction of a force vector.
 
So if I use W = F . s, then it would be

W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) ?
Or is it,
W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) cos 90 ?
 
cyberjupiter said:
So if I use W = F . s, then it would be

W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) ?
Or is it,
W = (19 + 21)(9.81)(16) cos 90 ?
this ^^^

Instead of writing the vector formula, it is often expressed as W = F s cosθ
and that's probably the best one to memorise.
 
NascentOxygen, would you tell me why the angle is 90? Shouldnt it be 0? And how about if I use sin 0? I will still get 0J.
 
cyberjupiter said:
NascentOxygen, would you tell me why the angle is 90? Shouldnt it be 0? And how about if I use sin 0? I will still get 0J.
The question just tests how easily confused you are.

The only force mentioned is weight, and it acts downwards ⇓
while the motion described is horizontal ⇒
and the angle between those two vector quantities is ... ?

You want to invent your own formula using sin 0° ? What angle in this picture is 0°?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K