Calculating Work in a Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter james brug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a block in a pulley system involving two blocks connected by a string over a massless and frictionless pulley. The problem specifies the weights of the blocks and their movements, prompting participants to explore the implications of these conditions on the work calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to determine the force exerted by the hanging block on the sliding block and the implications of acceleration on the system. Questions arise regarding the units used for the blocks and the necessity of calculating tension in the string to find the work done.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest calculating acceleration as a critical first step, while others emphasize the role of tension in determining the force acting on the blocks. There is no explicit consensus on the approach, but several lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the units of force and the dynamics of the system, particularly whether the blocks are accelerating or moving at constant speed. The original poster's attempt at calculating work is also questioned, indicating a need for further clarification on the setup.

james brug
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Work problem--blocks,pulley

Homework Statement



Two blocks are connected by a very light string passing over a massless and frictionless pulley . The 20.0 N block moves 75.0 cm to the right and the 12.0 N block moves 75.0 cm downward.

Find the total work done on 20.0N block if there is no friction between the table and the 20.0N block.

Homework Equations


[tex]w=f\cdot s[/tex]
[tex]f_k=\mu_k\cdot n[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


w=12N(.75m)=9J--mastering physics says it's wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Ya, your attempt is not correct. What you need to do is find out the force the hanging block exerts on the sliding block. Then you can do W=F*d using this force over a distance of 75cm.
 


First, are you sure the blocks are in Newtons? Very odd - would expect kg.
Second, I think the whole thing is more complicated because the blocks are accelerating. A force of 12 N down on the 2nd block will be opposed by the Tension in the string, so
sum of forces = ma
mg - T = ma
T = mg-ma and it will not be the full 12N pulling on the other block.
I think the first step will be to calculate the acceleration of the whole system.
 


Second, I think the whole thing is more complicated because the blocks are accelerating. A force of 12 N down on the 2nd block will be opposed by the Tension in the string, so
sum of forces = ma

That's probably it. There is a problem nearly identical to this in the book, but it says the blocks are moving at a constant speed.
 


I believe Delphi51 is correct.
 


T would give me the force on the 20N block and thus the work, yes?
a=12N/total weight?
 


I think you mean that a=(Force)/(mass) not weight. For the force, use the T from your first statement.
 


What first statement?
 
Last edited:


james brug said:
T would give me the force on the 20N block and thus the work, yes?

This statement. You say that solving for T would give you the force you need in the equation to find work.
 
  • #10


What about the work done on the other block? Is it the same?
 
Last edited:
  • #11


The work will not be the same for the other block. In this case the only force acting on it is mg. Therefore, your work will just be mg*.75m and I think it will be negative.
 
  • #12


I had already found that out, but thanks anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
33K