Calculating Ym and R for Two-Slit Interference: Tips and Tricks"

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to two-slit interference, where the spacing of slits changes, causing the bright fringe to shift from m=2 to m=3. The equation ym=R(mλ/d) is used, but the user is initially confused about how to find ym or R, given that R can be assumed constant in the far field. Clarification is provided that R does not need to be calculated, as it remains effectively constant for the analysis. The importance of visualizing the experiment through a diagram is emphasized to better understand the relationship between the variables. Ultimately, the user realizes that focusing on the relationship between the equations for different slit spacings is key to solving the problem.
tj.
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Right so I've been stuck with this for a while now and I'm sure it's just something simple that I've missed. Right so the question says there are a pair of closely spaced slits (0.300mm apart). By changing the spacing the bright fringe moves from position m=2 to m=3. The wavelength remains constant. And that is all the information given in the question.



ym=R(mλ/d)

So I've been given m and d but I don't have ym or R (being the distance between the screen and the slits).




I would be very grateful if someone could be help find ym or R. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you could assume R is constant if the screen is far away relative to the slit spacing?

Perhaps you could reproduce the question in full, because it is slightly ambiguous at the moment. What is it asking you to work out?
 
Okay sorry:

'You shine a laser on a pair of closely spaced slits. By turning the knob, you can change the spacing of the slits. (The wavelength of the laser light remains constant.) Initially, the slits are 0.300mm apart.

You change the spacing of the slits so that the m=2 bright fringe moves to the position initially occupied by the m=3 bright fringe. What is the new spacing of the slits?'
 
Well you don't need to worry about R, it is effectively constant over the region you're interested in (far field).

You might understand better what Ym is if you drew a picture of the experiment.

You can use the equation you wrote down for each different d:

y_3 = 3 R \lambda / d_1
y_2 = 2 R \lambda / d_2

I've just replaced m for its value for the two different slit widths. If you understand what Ym is you ought to be able to relate those two equations given what you've been told in the question?
 
Thanks JesseC! That's what it was, I was always trying to find a value for R. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K