Calculation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for two spin-1/2 particles. The original poster attempts to find the coefficients associated with the state |{0,0}\rangle by expressing it as a linear combination of the states |{1/2,-1/2}\rangle and |{-1/2,1/2}\rangle, while adhering to normalization and orthogonality conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the normalization condition and orthogonality in determining the coefficients. The original poster questions how to select the correct sign for the coefficient α, given two possible options. Others raise the importance of the relative phase between coefficients and how it relates to orthogonality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the significance of the relative phase and the conventions used in the literature. The original poster is exploring how to align their findings with standard conventions, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a specific convention from the Condon-Shortley convention regarding the assignment of coefficients, which introduces additional complexity to their problem. There is an acknowledgment of ambiguity in applying this convention to their specific case.

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two spin-1/2 particles and I need to calculate their Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I followed the procedure of applying [itex]J_-[/itex] to [itex]|{j,m}\rangle[/itex]
and [itex]J_{1-}[/itex] and [itex]J_{2-}[/itex] to [itex]|{m_1,m_2}\rangle[/itex] and comparing them. I got correctly
[itex]\langle{1,1}|{1/2,1/2}\rangle =1[/itex],
[itex]\langle{1,0}|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle=1/\sqrt{2}[/itex],
[itex]\langle{1,0}|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle =1/\sqrt{2}[/itex],
[itex]\langle{1,-1}|{-1/2,-1/2}\rangle=1[/itex].
Now I want to find [itex]\langle{0,0}|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle[/itex]
and [itex]\langle{0,0}|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle[/itex].
Therefore I denoted [itex]|{0,0}\rangle = \alpha|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle + \beta|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle[/itex]
and used the normalization condition [itex]|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1[/itex] and orthogonality to the [itex]|{1,0}\rangle[/itex] state. I got the equation
[itex]|\alpha|^2 = 1/2[/itex] from which there are 2 options:
[itex]\alpha = 1/\sqrt{2}[/itex] and [itex]\alpha = -1/\sqrt{2}[/itex] (only real coefficients by convention). How do I know which is the right option out of the two?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The overall sign of ##\alpha## doesn't really matter. What's important is the relative phase between ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. What combination of ##\alpha## and ##\beta## will yield a state orthogonal to ##|1, 0\rangle##?
 
Ok. I agree. But the standard table has a certain convention. How do I know how to pick the sign to fit this convention?
 
According to this page, this is the convention:

The Condon-Shortley convention is that the highest m-state of the larger component angular momentum is assigned a positive coefficient.

Still seems a bit ambiguous in your case, though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K