MHB Calculations - absolute stability

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave) The following Runge-Kutta method is given.

$$ \begin{array}{c|ccccc}
\tau_1 =0 & a_{11}=0 & a_{12} = 0\\
\tau_2 =\frac{5}{2} & a_{21} = \frac{5}{2} & a_{22} = 0\\
\hline
& b_1 = \frac{4}{5} & b_2 = \frac{1}{5} & \
\end{array} $$

I have to determine the order of accuracy and I found that it is $2$.


Then if the method is applied at the system $\\y_1'=-80y_1+20y_2 \\
y_2'=20y_1-80y_2$ what $h$ should we take so that the calculations get done with absolute stability?

How can we find such an $ h$?
I found that the region of absolute stability is $S=\{ z \in \mathbb{C}: |\frac{z^2}{2}+z+1|<1\}$. Does this help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi! (Mmm)

What do your notes say absolute stability is exactly? And how to find it? (Wondering)

Wiki says that the stability function $r$ is:
$$r(z) = 1 + z b^T (I-zA)^{-1} e = \frac{\det(I-zA+zeb^T)}{\det(I-zA)}$$
where $e$ stands for the vector of ones, and $b^T$ is the bottom row of the tableau. (Thinking)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top