Understanding Volume Calculations for Rotational Solids

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedBarchetta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Volume
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of solids formed by rotating regions bounded by specific curves around the x-axis using the cylindrical shells and discs methods. Participants express confusion about setting up the integrals, particularly regarding the roles of radius and height when using the cylindrical shell method. There is a suggestion to interchange x and y to simplify the equations for calculation, and clarification that the thickness of the shells should be considered instead of height. One participant successfully resolves their issues after receiving guidance on the integral setup. The conversation highlights common challenges in understanding volume calculations for rotational solids.
RedBarchetta
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
1.Consider the given curves to do the following.
x=4+(y-3)^{2}, x=8

Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume V of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the x-axis. Sketch the region and a typical shell.

I'm lost on x being a function of y. How do you even enter these into a TI-83? Is there any way to make these easier?

Here's another one I've been working on that has caused me problems.
_________________________________________________________________
2.The region bounded by the given curves is rotated about the x-axis.
y=-x^{2}+9x-18
y=0
Find the volume V of the resulting solid by any method.

First I graphed it:
htp://img377.imageshack.us/img377/3471/6338ol4.png (Just add another t in http)

cylindrical shell method
2 pi r h dr

I set up an integral. I get confused on determining the radius and height. If I'm rotating around the x-axis, I'm using y's. So, the radius should be y since it's centered around the y-axis. Then what is the shell height? The points at which the parabola crosses the curve are at x=3 and 6. So the shell height should be 6-y, but I think it should be where x = the equation.

But when I tried to single out x in the equation to get y as a function of x in y=-x^{2}+9x-18, I couldn't calculate it.

Discs method
The area of one disc:
A(x)=\pi * (-x^{2}+9x-18)^{2}

So the integral is
\pi times the integral of (-x^{2}+9x-18)^{2} dx

Now the limits of integration should be from 3 to 6. I then integrated, plugged in the answer to my homework application which prompted me with a predictable "wrong" result. I've had no problems integrating, as I've completed 85% of my homework, but I have a hard time setting these problems up. Especially these odd-ball problems.

I'm sorry for my vague descriptions. It's hard to describe some of these things over the net. I appreciate any help. Thank you! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi RedBarchetta! :smile:
RedBarchetta said:
I'm lost on x being a function of y. How do you even enter these into a TI-83? Is there any way to make these easier?

You can always change any variable letter into any other letter … provided, of course, you remember to change them back at the end!

Just interchange x and y, to give y = 4+(x-3)², y=8. :smile:
Then what is the shell height? The points at which the parabola crosses the curve are at x=3 and 6. So the shell height should be 6-y, but I think it should be where x = the equation.

Forget the word "height" … you need the area of each shell, and the thickness of each shell.

Then you integrate over the thickness … sometimes it's height, sometimes it's radius, sometimes … :confused:

In this case, the thickness is not x, but dx.

Just think of it as "thickness", and you won't be confused! :smile:
But when I tried to single out x in the equation to get y as a function of x in y=-x+9x-18, I couldn't calculate it.

Sorry … I don't understand this … y is a function of x. :confused:

Show us your working on the integral, and then we can see where the mistake is. :smile:
 
Thanks for the help Tiny-Tim! I figured both of these out now. :approve:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K