HomeyG
- 7
- 0
My understanding is that a bridge pier may slow down the water directly behind it, but doesn't slow down the whole river. After 30 meters or so, the effect is completely wiped out and the overall flow is not effected.
Why would a prop be any different? It's not. After a handful of meters the acceleration is completely absorbed as if it didn't happen. What possible good is it to increase the surface flow for such a small area?
Seems to me that they are lucky it doesn't work. If it did, if would be creating more surface waves and more water overflowing the banks. Remember this is not a uniform pipe, this is a meandering river with turns, changes in depth, width, and elevation.
Where are these bottlenecks? The whole area is in danger not just a few 30 meter spots along the river.
Why would a prop be any different? It's not. After a handful of meters the acceleration is completely absorbed as if it didn't happen. What possible good is it to increase the surface flow for such a small area?
Seems to me that they are lucky it doesn't work. If it did, if would be creating more surface waves and more water overflowing the banks. Remember this is not a uniform pipe, this is a meandering river with turns, changes in depth, width, and elevation.
Where are these bottlenecks? The whole area is in danger not just a few 30 meter spots along the river.