Can 1,000 Boats Really Push the Chao Praya River Out to Sea Faster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HomeyG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and effectiveness of a project in Bangkok aimed at using a fleet of 1,000 boats to push the Chao Phraya River's floodwaters out to sea more quickly. Participants explore various aspects of this initiative, including its potential impact on river flow, energy efficiency, and the mechanics of water movement in large rivers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the practicality of using boats to push floodwaters, suggesting that it may be a silly idea.
  • Others argue that the additional power from the boats could significantly increase the river's flow rate, comparing it to other rivers with similar characteristics.
  • Concerns are raised about the fuel costs associated with running so many boats continuously.
  • Some participants highlight the inefficiency of boat propellers, suggesting that energy is wasted when they operate at high speeds.
  • A viewpoint is presented that efficiency may not be the priority in a flood situation; rather, the focus should be on quickly reducing floodwaters.
  • One participant draws a parallel to a ferry system that uses a different propulsion method, suggesting it might be more effective than traditional propellers.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of the boats' ability to influence the entire river flow, with some arguing that the effects would be localized and not beneficial downstream.
  • Participants mention the use of specialized boats in other countries that have been effective in flood situations, suggesting that similar strategies could be applied here.
  • Some express skepticism about the overall effectiveness of the project, raising concerns about potential standing waves and backflow caused by the boats.
  • There is a call for more data on the Chao Phraya River's characteristics to better assess the project's viability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed technique. Multiple competing views remain regarding the potential impact of the boats on the river's flow and the overall feasibility of the project.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specific data about the Chao Phraya River, such as average discharge flow, width, depth, and slope, to evaluate the project's potential effectiveness. There are also references to bottlenecks in river flow that could influence the outcome of the initiative.

  • #31
My understanding is that a bridge pier may slow down the water directly behind it, but doesn't slow down the whole river. After 30 meters or so, the effect is completely wiped out and the overall flow is not effected.

Why would a prop be any different? It's not. After a handful of meters the acceleration is completely absorbed as if it didn't happen. What possible good is it to increase the surface flow for such a small area?

Seems to me that they are lucky it doesn't work. If it did, if would be creating more surface waves and more water overflowing the banks. Remember this is not a uniform pipe, this is a meandering river with turns, changes in depth, width, and elevation.

Where are these bottlenecks? The whole area is in danger not just a few 30 meter spots along the river.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jetwaterluffy said:
Why do they need the whole boat? Why don't they just take the engine out? If you hold it down, it doesn't need to float.

Because the boats are already there. The reason this is being experimented with is because it's quite easy to do with little additional cost.
 
  • #33
HomeyG said:
My understanding is that a bridge pier may slow down the water directly behind it, but doesn't slow down the whole river. After 30 meters or so, the effect is completely wiped out and the overall flow is not effected.
That's not true. Bridge pier does not slow flow - just contrary, water flows faster under the bridge than on open wider part. But it introduces significant resistance to the flow, effecting with damming of the water. You may better see it on smaller rivers flowing more quickly than Chao Phraya: the water levels before and after the bridge often differ by 20cm or more - which is equivalent to average level difference on over hundred meters along the river.

Boats (or other high flow pumps) installed in such bottleneck places may help to reduce (unload) this damming, thus making the slope higher on open area, which speed the whole river.

Such effect is even more important on very flat (low slope) rivers like Chao Phraya - here every 1cm saved on damming under a bridge increases then the natural gravity push for the river by 10% on next 2km.
Where are these bottlenecks? The whole area is in danger not just a few 30 meter spots along the river.
Bottlenecks are points where the flow encounters in a short area strong resistance, stronger, than average on hundreds meters, causing damming of water - even very small, like few mm, may be worth to reduce on such flat river.
 
  • #34
Thanks for the explanation XTS.

I still have a hard time believing boats are making any difference, but I appreciate you trying to explain it to me.
 
  • #35
Well - I am not sure how effective it may be on so large river like Chao Praya.
But it was used successfully on 100 times smaller (and much faster) rivers using just single pumping boats.
So I can't say if they may improve the flow by 1% or by 10% using that 1000 boats. But for some people even 1% improvement may mean that their houses stay dry - I saw TV this morning showing the water flooding streets of Bangkok already.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K