Can a Black Hole Self-Destruct?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgldr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential for black holes to self-destruct, exploring concepts such as matter-energy conversion and gravitational forces. It is established that converting matter into energy does not alter a black hole's gravitational pull. The Schwarzschild radius and photon sphere are critical points in understanding the dynamics of black holes, particularly regarding angular momentum's effect on gravitational force. The effective potential formula is provided to illustrate how angular momentum influences force inside and outside the photon sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schwarzschild radius and its implications in black hole physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of effective potential in gravitational fields
  • Knowledge of angular momentum and its role in gravitational interactions
  • Basic principles of matter-energy equivalence as defined by Einstein's theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Schwarzschild radius in black hole stability
  • Learn about the effective potential and its applications in gravitational physics
  • Research the role of angular momentum in astrophysical phenomena
  • Explore the concept of photon spheres and their significance in black hole dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics interested in the mechanics of black holes and gravitational theories.

rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,948
Reaction score
687
Curious about this. One possiblity is that matter in the black hole would be converted into energy, which might reduce the gravitational pull. Would it be possible that "dark matter' is created with anti-gravitational effects? Or maybe if enough mass is accumulated, combined with a high rate of spin, that the outer matter would pull the black hole appart?

Another issue I don't understand is that I've read that gravity in a black hole is stronger than the strong force. I had the impression that the closer the objects, the more dominate the strong force would be.

Last question, why isn't the nucleus of an atom like a mini-black hole? How closely packed are these?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Jeff Reid said:
Curious about this. One possiblity is that matter in the black hole would be converted into energy, which might reduce the gravitational pull.

The gravitational pull is related to the total energy, which includes matter. Converting matter into energy or vice versa would NOT change the gravitational pull in any way.

Jeff Reid said:
....Or maybe if enough mass is accumulated, combined with a high rate of spin, that the outer matter would pull the black hole appart?......

You're thinking that the inertial force associated with rotation would counter the gravitational attaction. However, inside the Schwarzschild radius this force is directed inwardly, not outwardly.

:biggrin:
 
mijoon said:
The gravitational pull is related to the total energy, which includes matter. Converting matter into energy or vice versa would NOT change the gravitational pull in any way.
You're thinking that the inertial force associated with rotation would counter the gravitational attaction. However, inside the Schwarzschild radius this force is directed inwardly, not outwardly.

:biggrin:

Yep - actually the break-point is at r=3M, which is the photon sphere.

If you take the effective potiential
http://www.fourmilab.ch/gravitation/orbits/

[tex] V=\sqrt{(1-\frac{2M}{r})(1+L^2/r^2)[/tex]

and take the "force" as the rate of change of the effective potential with radius, i.e. F=dV/dr, you find that the force is equal to

[tex] \frac{M + (3M-r)\frac{L^2}{r^2}} {\sqrt{r(r-2M)(r^2+L^2)}}[/tex]

Here M is the mass of the black hole (in geometric units), r is your schwarzschild radial coordinate, and L is your angular momentum.

Focusing on the numerator and Ingoring the denominator, you can thus see that the "sign" of the contribution of angular momentum, L, to the total force changes character at r=3M. Outside the photon sphere, having L>0 reduces the force. Inside the sphere, having L>0 actually _increases_ the force!This is actually consrervative - at the photon sphere itself, there is no change in force due to L in the numerator, but it's clear that increase L always increases the denominator, thus even at the photon sphere (r=3M), increasing L decreases the force.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K