Can a Continuous Function Map Reals to Rationals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A continuous function mapping real numbers to rational numbers cannot exist. This conclusion is based on the properties of continuity and the topological characteristics of the real numbers versus the rationals. Specifically, the proof hinges on the fact that the inverse image of a closed set in the rationals must also be closed in the reals, leading to a contradiction regarding limit points. The discussion highlights the importance of connectedness and the Intermediate Value Theorem in understanding this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuity in topology
  • Familiarity with limit points and closed sets
  • Knowledge of the Intermediate Value Theorem
  • Basic concepts of connectedness in topological spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions in topology
  • Explore the implications of the Intermediate Value Theorem in various contexts
  • Investigate the differences between connected and disconnected spaces
  • Examine the concept of metrizable spaces and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions and their implications in real analysis.

  • #31
theorem: every continuous function from the reals to the rationals is constant.
proof the image of the map is an interval containing only rationals, hence of form [c,c].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mathwonk said:
theorem: every continuous function from the reals to the rationals is constant.
proof the image of the map is an interval containing only rationals, hence of form [c,c].

Yes, but doesn't this theorem only hold for the rationals with the relative topology with respect to the real numbers with the usual topology?

If you give the rationals the indiscrete topology, isn't every function continuous?
 
  • #33
Yes, but of course, when asking if there is a continus map between sets X and Y we always need to think of the given topologies on sets, since the question is ill-defined otherwise.
 
  • #34
DeadWolfe said:
Yes, but of course, when asking if there is a continus map between sets X and Y we always need to think of the given topologies on sets, since the question is ill-defined otherwise.

Well yeah, but my question a few posts ago asks about a possible metric topology on the rationals such that you can create a continuous function from the reals (usual topology) to the rationals (with new metric topology).

Haven't gave much thought yet. I should write a list of things to think about.
 
  • #35
Of course there are continuous functions from the Reals to the rationals, as has been repeatedly pointed out (constant maps). Perhaps you mean continuous *surjections*, or even just non-constant continuous maps.

Yes if f:X\to Y is map either from the discrete or to the indiscrete topology it is trivially continuous.

Mind you, what metric d'ya think gives the indsicrete topology?
 
  • #36
matt grime said:
Mind you, what metric d'ya think gives the indsicrete topology?

There is none of course.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K