Can a Continuous Function Map Reals to Rationals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a continuous function can exist that maps real numbers to rational numbers. Participants explore this concept through various topological properties and definitions of continuity, considering implications of connectedness and limit points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of a continuous function from the reals to the rationals, expressing an initial intuition against it.
  • Another participant suggests that the answer is "no" and prompts a discussion on the topological properties that differentiate the reals from the rationals.
  • Several participants discuss the implications of continuity and limit points, with one asserting that an uncountable inverse image must exist for any rational point, leading to a contradiction.
  • Connectedness is highlighted as a critical aspect, with participants agreeing that it plays a significant role in the argument against the existence of such a function.
  • One participant presents a proof involving limit points and closed sets, while others challenge the validity of this proof and point out potential flaws in reasoning.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of sequences and limit points, with some participants arguing that constant sequences do not yield limit points, while others assert that they do.
  • Participants explore the concept of open and closed sets within the rationals, questioning whether certain examples provided are valid in demonstrating the disconnectedness of the rationals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of continuous functions mapping reals to rationals, with some supporting the idea that it is impossible while others engage in refining arguments and proofs without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include unresolved mathematical steps regarding limit points and the nature of sequences, as well as varying interpretations of continuity and connectedness in the context of topology.

  • #31
theorem: every continuous function from the reals to the rationals is constant.
proof the image of the map is an interval containing only rationals, hence of form [c,c].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mathwonk said:
theorem: every continuous function from the reals to the rationals is constant.
proof the image of the map is an interval containing only rationals, hence of form [c,c].

Yes, but doesn't this theorem only hold for the rationals with the relative topology with respect to the real numbers with the usual topology?

If you give the rationals the indiscrete topology, isn't every function continuous?
 
  • #33
Yes, but of course, when asking if there is a continus map between sets X and Y we always need to think of the given topologies on sets, since the question is ill-defined otherwise.
 
  • #34
DeadWolfe said:
Yes, but of course, when asking if there is a continus map between sets X and Y we always need to think of the given topologies on sets, since the question is ill-defined otherwise.

Well yeah, but my question a few posts ago asks about a possible metric topology on the rationals such that you can create a continuous function from the reals (usual topology) to the rationals (with new metric topology).

Haven't gave much thought yet. I should write a list of things to think about.
 
  • #35
Of course there are continuous functions from the Reals to the rationals, as has been repeatedly pointed out (constant maps). Perhaps you mean continuous *surjections*, or even just non-constant continuous maps.

Yes if f:X\to Y is map either from the discrete or to the indiscrete topology it is trivially continuous.

Mind you, what metric d'ya think gives the indsicrete topology?
 
  • #36
matt grime said:
Mind you, what metric d'ya think gives the indsicrete topology?

There is none of course.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K