Can a Mistake in KVL Analysis Disprove a Fundamental Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandy.bridge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kvl
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in a circuit analysis problem, where the original poster expresses confusion over conflicting results obtained from two loops in the circuit. There is a concern about whether this inconsistency could indicate a fundamental error in understanding KVL.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply KVL to two different loops but encounters contradictory results. Some participants question the clarity of the circuit configuration and the role of components like the diode and resistor. Others suggest that redrawing the circuit may help clarify the application of KVL.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen participants exploring different interpretations of the circuit setup and the application of KVL. There has been some productive guidance regarding the need to consider all voltage drops, as indicated by the original poster's realization about the diode's voltage drop.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific voltage drop across the diode that was initially overlooked, which may have contributed to the confusion in applying KVL. The original poster's work appears to be constrained by the need for clarity in circuit representation.

sandy.bridge
Messages
797
Reaction score
1
Here's my work. When I apply KVL around loop 1, I get +5V, but when I apply it around loop 2, I get -5, which is inconsistent with my first results?

Where am I going wrong, or have I disproved a fundamental law?

ya-1.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, my work got cut out. The bottom says: +V+5=0, V=-5
 
I only see one loop. And what's the diode and resistor on the left supposed to be indicating?
 
I had redrawn the network on the left and configured it to the form on the right. This is how my textbook deals with KVL.
 
Never mind. I figured it out. I entirely forgot that there is a 10V drop across the diode.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K