Can a Non-Invertible Function Become Invertible in Certain Intervals?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
ZeroPivot
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
can a function that's not inversable be inversible in certain interwalls. is it ok to say its inversable in this specific intervall or can't the function ever be called inversible?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, but technically, it wouldn't be the same function.

For example, [itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex]is not "invertible" because it is neither "one to one" nor "onto". However, if we restrict the domain to the "non-negative real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]. If we restrict the domain to the "non-positive real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]-\sqrt{x}[/itex].

However, the domain of a function is as much a part of its definition as the "formula". That is, "[itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any real number", "[itex]g(x)=x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number", and [itex]h(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number" are three different functions. The first does not have an inverse, the last two do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, but technically, it wouldn't be the same function.

For example, [itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex]is not "invertible" because it is neither "one to one" nor "onto". However, if we restrict the domain to the "non-negative real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]. If we restrict the domain to the "non-positive real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]-\sqrt{x}[/itex].

However, the domain of a function is as much a part of its definition as the "formula". That is, "[itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any real number", "[itex]g(x)=x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number", and [itex]h(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number" are three different functions. The first does not have an inverse, the last two do.

can i say function y=x^2 is inversible for x E [0 ,4] ?
 
Yes, the function
[tex]f: [0,4]\to [0,16],\ x\mapsto x^2[/tex]
is an invertible function because of the domain that has been specified (also it needs to have the right codomain, or it won't be an onto function, but that's more of a technicality that is washed away by restricting the codomain to whatever the range is)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ZeroPivot said:
can i say function y=x^2 is inversible for x E [0 ,4] ?
"Inversible" is not a word - the one you want is invertible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
So why is "reversible" a word and not "revertible"?
 
Mark44 said:
"Inversible" is not a word - the one you want is invertible.

Possibly because the adjectives invertible and reversible come from the verbs to invert and to reverse, respectively.