MHB Can a Point Exist in an Integratable Function Where the Integral Equals Half?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for an integrable function f on the interval [0,1], where f(x) is greater than or equal to 1, there exists a point c in [0,1] such that the integral from 0 to c of f(t) equals 1/2. Participants agree that the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) is essential for the proof. They establish that the function F(x) = ∫0^x f(t) dt - 1/2 is continuous and show that F(0) is negative and F(1) is positive, leading to the conclusion that there must be a point c where F(c) = 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding integral properties and the application of IVT in this context.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
A function is integratable on [0,1] and that $$f(x)\ge 1 $$ for $$0 \le x\le1$$. Show that there must be a point, c, on the interval [0,1] such that $$\int_{0}^{c} f(t)\,dt = \frac{1}{2}$$.

Can anyone point me to the right direction as to how to solve this? I.e does it require the IVT, the FTC, etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This requires the IVT.
 
Just what I didn't want to hear, lol. I haven't done any proofs requiring IVT. Can you start me off?
 
Hi Rido12,

Since $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$, the function

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

is continuous on $[0,1]$. Show that $ F (0) < 0$ and $ F (1) > 0$ (using the fact that $ f \ge 1$ on $[0,1] $). Then you can use IVT to deduce the result.
 
Euge said:
$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I know that to be true, in general:
$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x} f(t)\,dt = F(x) + K$
because the derivative of a constant is 0, but how did you deduce the above?
 
Rido12 said:
I know that to be true, in general:
$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x} f(t)\,dt = F(x) + K$
because the derivative of a constant is 0, but how did you deduce the above?

There's no need to involve the derivative. You know $ F$ is continuous on $[0,1] $, $F (0) = -\frac{1}{2} < 0$ and (since $f \ge 1$)

$\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$.

So by the IVT, there is a point $c\in (0,1) $ such that $ F (c) = 0$. In other words,

$\displaystyle \int_0^c f (t)\, dt = \frac{1}{2} $.
 
Right! The answer was so obvious...I got up to the point right before you applied the IVT, but I thought I was oversimplifying it. Thanks!

EDIT: On second though, I think my "thanks" was a bit premature. I understand your logic, but I'm still confused as to how you came up with this conclusion:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I understand how you got $F(0)$:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^0 f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}=0-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{-1}{2}<0$

But how did you get $\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$?
 
Last edited:
Rido12 said:
Right! The answer was so obvious...I got up to the point right before you applied the IVT, but I thought I was oversimplifying it. Thanks!

EDIT: On second though, I think my "thanks" was a bit premature. I understand your logic, but I'm still confused as to how you came up with this conclusion:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^x f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}$

I understand how you got $F(0)$:

$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_ 0^0 f(t)\, dt - \frac{1}{2}=0-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{-1}{2}<0$

But how did you get $\displaystyle F (1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} > 0$?

Since $f(x) \ge 1$ for all $ x\in [0,1]$, we have

$\displaystyle \int_0^1 f(x)\, dx \ge \int_0^1 1 dx = 1$,

and therefore $ F(1) \ge 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} $.

Keep in mind this important property of integrals. If $ f $ and $ g $ are integrable on $[a, b] $ such that $f (x ) \ge g (x)$ for all $ x\in [a, b] $, then

$\displaystyle \int_a^b f (x)\, dx \ge \int_a^b g (x)\, dx$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K