Can a Sequence of Polynomials Satisfy Given Conditions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the existence of a sequence of polynomials {Pn} that satisfies the conditions Pn(0) = 1 for all n and Pn(z) → 0 for all z ≠ 0 as n approaches infinity. Participants argue that such a sequence cannot exist due to the implications of the maximum modulus theorem, which would be violated if Pn(z) approaches 0 for |z| = r while Pn(0) remains 1. The conversation also explores specific polynomial forms, such as f = (1 - x^2/n^n)^n and f = (1 - x^2/n)^n, and their convergence properties in both real and complex domains.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial sequences and limits.
  • Familiarity with the maximum modulus theorem in complex analysis.
  • Knowledge of convergence concepts in real and complex functions.
  • Experience with Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, particularly problem-solving techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the maximum modulus theorem in detail to understand its implications for polynomial sequences.
  • Explore convergence criteria for sequences of functions in complex analysis.
  • Investigate specific polynomial forms and their limits, particularly in the context of complex variables.
  • Review examples of sequences of polynomials and their behavior at different points in the complex plane.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of polynomial sequences and their convergence behaviors.

redrzewski
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
This is problem 13.3 from Rudin's Real and Complex analysis. It is not homework.

Is there a sequence of polynomials {Pn} such that Pn(0) = 1 for n = 1,2,3,... but Pn(z) -> 0 for all z != 0 as n -> infinity?

My guess here is no. Sketch of proof: Assume such a sequence existed. Then we should be able to contradict the maximum modulus theorem for any disk around 0 since all Pn(z) for |z| = r will be approaching 0 for large enough n, but Pn(0) = 1.

Is this correct?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what you mean by converges.
clearly if you fix n lim x->infinity pn(x)=infinity
but it may be that if you fix x lim n->infinity pn(x)=0
consider
f=(1-x^2/n^n)^n
 
Can you clarify that? Say we fix an "r", and take the circle |z| = r. Then for any finite n, and z on this circle, with your f, f(z) will either be approching 0, or approaching infinity. It doesn't seem like all the values on the circle can be driven to 0 at the same time for a given n.

Your function will work fine for real x. But I can't seem to make it work for the complex case. What am I missing?

Also, I could be blowing the limit computation, but doesn't that f converge to 1 for all finite x as n goes to infinity?

And if we go with:
f = (1-x^2/n)^n, that'll converge to exp(-x^2), which has the same problem that I can't drive all the values on the circle to 0.

thanks for your time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K