Can a Star Exist with Negative Pressure?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter astromandi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Pressure Star
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of a star existing with negative pressure, exploring theoretical implications, equations of state, and the behavior of such a star under gravitational forces. The scope includes conceptual and theoretical aspects of astrophysics and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a star can exist with a negative pressure equation of state, suggesting scenarios like inflating red giants or supernovae.
  • One participant notes that gravitational attraction is influenced by energy, mass, and pressure, mentioning that negative pressure could lead to repulsive gravitational effects, as seen with dark energy.
  • Another participant argues that a star with negative pressure would likely collapse quickly, as positive pressure is necessary to counteract gravitational collapse.
  • A participant raises the idea that a star could theoretically exist in equilibrium with negative pressure, questioning whether it would enhance collapse or lead to a different behavior than expected.
  • Some participants discuss the distinction between dark energy and dark matter, with one clarifying that dark energy is associated with negative pressure and has implications for cosmic expansion.
  • There is a suggestion that dark energy dynamics differ significantly from those of a star with a similar equation of state, particularly in terms of spatial symmetry and the governing equations of general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of negative pressure for stellar formation and stability. There is no consensus on whether a star with negative pressure can exist or what its characteristics would be.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the concept of negative pressure, including its dependence on definitions and the differing behaviors of dark energy and dark matter in various contexts.

astromandi
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Star with negative pressure?

Is it possible to have a star with matter with unusual equation of state.
Will it be possible to have a star with negative pressure.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


astromandi said:
Is it possible to have a star with matter with unusual equation of state.
Will it be possible to have a star with negative pressure.
Maybe an inflating red giant or a supernova.
 


Great question!
As you may know, gravitational attraction occurs via three sources: energy, mass pressure. All are included in Einstein's mass/energy tensor in general relativity. So do "anti-gravitational" or "negative gravitational" repulsive effects.

Matter normally has positive pressure; dark matter has negative pressure and enough of that becomes inflationary...in other words it becomes repulsive under gravity. Negative pressure appears to be the basis of the cosmogolical constant and appears to be contained in dark energy...I don't think anybody has much of a theory yet...Oddly, unlike ordinary energy it has the same value from any reference frame...hence "cosmological".

Einstein's theory that the repulsive cosmological force is tiny and becomes large enough to overcome gravity only at cosmologically large distances is still intact...hence you and I are not moving apart as a result; gravity easily holds us and our galaxy together.

So with that as background:
I'm going to guess the answer to your question is NO, for two reasons: first the force is very tiny, second it's repulsive so it seems unlikely to me it will aggregate like positive mass ordinary matter does...due to normal gravity. But who knows?

Brian Greene discusses this in Chapter 10, FABRIC OF THE COSMOS.
 


Since it is the (positive) pressure that prevents gravity from collapsing the star, a star with negative pressure would very quickly collapse.
 


Why does it have to be a inflating star??
Can be have a star in equilibrium with material with negative pressure??

Suppose we have a star with no pressure atall in will collapse(free fall)
If there is a positive pressure then it would try to stop/resist the collapse.
If there is a negative pressure should it not enhance the collapse making it faster??
And we should never an ever-imploding system instead of inflating supernona?
 


Depending on what is meant by negative pressure, a entity might NOT collapse..it might never form because negative pressure can be gravitationally repulsive...as apparently with dark energy.
 
Last edited:


Naty1 said:
Depending on what is meant by negative pressure, a entity might NOT collapse..it might never form because negative pressure can be gravitationally repulsive...as apparently with dark matter.

You mean dark energy; dark matter is something quite different. Dark energy stars have been pushed chiefly by George Chapline, whose theories are well outside mainstream physics.
 


George, thanks I edited to replace matter with energy...The concept of negative pressure itself is now common...from Guth, Brian Greene and many others...not that such acceptance will ultimately make it correct!
 


Dark energy behavior would be completely different.
Since When we deal with dark energy we have matter(Don`t know weather to call it matter or something else) with negative energy.

And we study it`s dynamics in the spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe.

Whereas when we deal with similar matter (with same equation of state) in case of the star we deal with spherically symmetric spacetime.
hence dynamics (dictated by Einstein`s equation) would be entirely different.

In the FRW universe density of dark energy remains constant.
Whereas that may not be the case in spherically symmetric spacetime. As governing Einstein`s equations are totally different.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K