Can a Unitary Operator Be Expressed in Exponential Form?

Juan Carlos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working on this problem:

Let [itex]\hat{U}[/itex] an unitary operator defined by:
[itex]\hat{U}=\frac{I+i\hat{G}}{I-i\hat{G}}[/itex] with [itex]\hat{G}[/itex] hermitian. Show that [itex]\hat{U}[/itex] can be written as: [itex]\hat{U}=Exp[i\hat{K}][/itex] where [itex]\hat{K}[/itex] is hermitian.



Homework Equations


[itex]\hat{U}=\frac{I+i\hat{G}}{I-i\hat{G}}[/itex] , [itex]\hat{U}=Exp[i\hat{K}][/itex]




The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at a solution: I have to show who is [itex]\hat{K}=\hat{K}(\hat{G})[/itex] (as a function) so after several algebra manipulation,equating the two relevant equations I arrive to:

[itex]\hat{G}=tan(\frac{\hat{K}}{2})[/itex]

I would like to simply apply the inverse of tan, in that way:

[itex]\hat{K}=2 arctan(\hat{G})[/itex]. I do not know if it is arctan defined for an operator, if it is, I think that is via taylor Series.

Some help please
 
on Phys.org
Try taylor-expanding [itex]\hat U[/itex] w.r.t. [itex]\hat G[/itex]!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I've tried, but i think this is not the way because when you expand both sides there is no clear relation between G and K.
 
Don't forget those important words: Hermition and unitary. You probably need to use those.

You can get there in a couple ways. Expansion by a Taylor series is one way. Be careful that you don't depend things commuting if they don't.
 
I agree. And I used those properties. Thanks
 
You may be over-thinking this problem.

Simply equate Exp[i K] = (I +iG)/(I-iG) and solve by taking the log of both sides. (Note issues of phase in your equality after taking the log etc.)

Now you have a form of K in terms of G, which you must show is Hermitian. This is where a series expansion comes into play. Expand your K as a series expansion, and show that by daggering (taking the Hermitian conjugate of) each term in the expansion you leave the expansion unchanged, thus showing that K is Hermitian, and showing the solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K