Can a Unitary Operator Be Expressed in Exponential Form?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a unitary operator defined in terms of a hermitian operator. The goal is to express this unitary operator in exponential form, specifically showing a relationship between the operators involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the operators and suggest various methods, including Taylor expansion and logarithmic manipulation. There are questions about the validity of applying inverse functions to operators and the implications of hermitian and unitary properties.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with multiple approaches being explored. Some participants suggest specific methods, while others express uncertainty about the effectiveness of those methods. There is no clear consensus, but several lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the properties of hermitian and unitary operators in their discussions. There is also mention of potential issues related to operator commutation and the definition of functions like arctan in the context of operators.

Juan Carlos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working on this problem:

Let [itex]\hat{U}[/itex] an unitary operator defined by:
[itex]\hat{U}=\frac{I+i\hat{G}}{I-i\hat{G}}[/itex] with [itex]\hat{G}[/itex] hermitian. Show that [itex]\hat{U}[/itex] can be written as: [itex]\hat{U}=Exp[i\hat{K}][/itex] where [itex]\hat{K}[/itex] is hermitian.



Homework Equations


[itex]\hat{U}=\frac{I+i\hat{G}}{I-i\hat{G}}[/itex] , [itex]\hat{U}=Exp[i\hat{K}][/itex]




The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at a solution: I have to show who is [itex]\hat{K}=\hat{K}(\hat{G})[/itex] (as a function) so after several algebra manipulation,equating the two relevant equations I arrive to:

[itex]\hat{G}=tan(\frac{\hat{K}}{2})[/itex]

I would like to simply apply the inverse of tan, in that way:

[itex]\hat{K}=2 arctan(\hat{G})[/itex]. I do not know if it is arctan defined for an operator, if it is, I think that is via taylor Series.

Some help please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try taylor-expanding [itex]\hat U[/itex] w.r.t. [itex]\hat G[/itex]!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I've tried, but i think this is not the way because when you expand both sides there is no clear relation between G and K.
 
Don't forget those important words: Hermition and unitary. You probably need to use those.

You can get there in a couple ways. Expansion by a Taylor series is one way. Be careful that you don't depend things commuting if they don't.
 
I agree. And I used those properties. Thanks
 
You may be over-thinking this problem.

Simply equate Exp[i K] = (I +iG)/(I-iG) and solve by taking the log of both sides. (Note issues of phase in your equality after taking the log etc.)

Now you have a form of K in terms of G, which you must show is Hermitian. This is where a series expansion comes into play. Expand your K as a series expansion, and show that by daggering (taking the Hermitian conjugate of) each term in the expansion you leave the expansion unchanged, thus showing that K is Hermitian, and showing the solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K