MHB Can Absolute Values of Quadratic Functions Determine Their Discriminants?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the inequality |f(x)| ≥ |g(x)| holds for all real x, then the absolute values of their discriminants satisfy |Δ_f| ≥ |Δ_g|. The quadratic functions are defined as f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c, with the discriminant Δ given by Δ = b^2 - 4ac. Participants express uncertainty about how to approach the proof, with one member referencing a challenge problem previously posted on another forum. A solution to the problem is mentioned as being available in the last post of that thread. The conversation highlights the relationship between the properties of quadratic functions and their discriminants.
Mathick
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Let $$ f(x)$$ and $$ g(x)$$ be quadratic functions such as the inequality $$ \left| f(x) \right| \ge \left| g(x) \right| $$ is hold for all real $$ x$$ . Prove that $$ \left| \Delta_f \right| \ge \left| \Delta_g \right|$$. For quadratic function $$ f(x)=ax^2+bx+c $$, then $$ \Delta=b^2-4ac. $$

I have no idea how I could start this task. Please, help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Mathick,

This was actually a challenge problem that anemone posted http://mathhelpboards.com/challenge-questions-puzzles-28/prove-b-4ac-8804-b-4ac-15129.html. A solution is provided in the last post.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top