Can Alternative Number Systems Offer Greater Advantages for Problem Solving?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iggybaseball
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential advantages of alternative number systems compared to the commonly used base 10 system. Participants explore various bases, their historical contexts, and their applications in different fields, including computing and everyday counting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that base 2, used in computers, is beneficial due to its binary nature, allowing for efficient calculations with on/off signals.
  • Others mention base 16 (hexadecimal) as a shorthand for binary, facilitating easier representation of binary data.
  • Base 8 is noted as less common but has applications in certain biological contexts.
  • A participant highlights the natural base 'e' as significant in calculus, although it lacks a rational decimal approximation.
  • One participant points out that the prevalence of base 10 is largely due to human anatomy, specifically having ten fingers, and references historical base 20 systems used by various cultures.
  • Another participant discusses the historical use of base 8 in early computing and the transition to base 16 for character representation.
  • Some American Indian cultures reportedly used a counting system based on 4, which was not a true place value system.
  • A distinction is made between number systems and numeral systems, emphasizing that different bases are merely different notations for the same underlying number system.
  • Base 12 is proposed as a practical base due to its divisibility by the first six counting numbers, which some argue makes it useful for everyday calculations.
  • A participant humorously mentions using base 1 in card games, indicating its informal utility.
  • Another participant shares a personal anecdote about counting in base 20 using fingers and toes, illustrating the adaptability of counting methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the usefulness of different number systems, with no consensus on which base is superior or more advantageous for problem-solving. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the historical use of number systems are based on cultural practices, and there are unresolved questions about the implications of using different bases in various contexts.

iggybaseball
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I do not know a lot about math theory, however I know that we (America) (I'm not sure if it's different for different parts of the world) use a base 10 number system. I also know that there have been other number systems invented. Can number systems other than base 10 be more beneficial for specific problems? If so, could you give an example? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The first obvious example is base 2, what computers use. Computers really don't have a way of storing "part" of a value, so they deal with litteral "on" and "off" values, which are 1 and 0 respectively. Base 2 is very helpful in this arena because it allows computers to do a lot of math using just on and off signals. (Base 2 is often called "binary".)

A natural extention of base 2 is base 16 (since 2^4 = 16). This base (in computer terms called "hexadecimal") is used to abbreviate base 2 numbers since not everyone wants to have to write out all the 1s and 0s, so every hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 binary digits.

You'll occationally see base 8 in use (2^3, go figure), but it's fairly uncommon. I believe it's most practical use is in certain biology aspects.

There is also the natural base, e, which serves as a fundamental base number that makes recursive appearances in calculus and aids in making some calculations simpler. 'e' has no rational decimal approximation (like pi), it's equivilent about 2.78...

Overall, though, the number base you choose to use for something is up to you, and it's all about convenience. Realistically, it doesn't matter what base you use, it's still the same number. The only difference is how you say it, and how easily you say it. Some bases may be faster for computer math calculations, while others may be more consise, while others may aid in solving math problems; it's just about what helps.
 
The only reason we use base ten is that we have ten fingers in our hands. In the antiquity some people used their fingers and toes to count and got a sort of base 20 system. This can still be seen in French that uses quatre-vingts (four twenties) to denote 80.
In ancient English they also used the word score to denote 20, so 60 could be called threescore.
Mayans also seemed to use a base 20 number system and Babylonians used a base 60 one. This is still useful in the measurement of time and angles with 60 seconds to the minute and 60 minutes to the hour or degree.
 
Historical note (computer base). Internally, it has always been base 2 for the reasons discussed above. In the early days of computers (up to around 1960 when IBM came out with 360 series), people used base eight as the shorthand for binary representations (3 bit numbers), while at the same time 6 bits were used for character representations. When the 360 series was introduced, IBM changed to 8 bits for character representations, so that 4 bits (hexadecimal) became the shorthand for binary representation.

As you can see in both the old and current systems, 2 "numbers" are used for each character.
 
Some American Indians, along the Pacific coast used a number system based on 4 (it was not an actual place value system so wasn't, technically, "base 4") because they counted using the spaces BETWEEN fingers.
 
I feel the need to point out that we're not talking about different number systems -- we're talking about different numeral systems.

No matter what base we use, we're still talking about the same number system. We're just discussing different notations for numbers, in particular, how we use numerals.
 
I was always fond of base 1.

I'll bet pretty much all of you have used it regularly at some time in your lives.

Hint: it's used a lot when scoring card games.
 

Attachments

  • base.gif
    base.gif
    5.4 KB · Views: 491
Last edited:
Base 12 is probably the most useful base for a convenient numbering system. With one exception (5), it is divisible by the first 6 counting numbers. That pretty much covers all the common dividing needs we have.


(BTW, note that Base 60 is the smallest base that is divisible by all 6 of the first counting numbers. I wonder if the base 60 numbering system is a coincidence?)
 
DaveC426913 said:
Base 12 is probably the most useful base for a convenient numbering system. With one exception (5), it is divisible by the first 6 counting numbers. That pretty much covers all the common dividing needs we have.


(BTW, note that Base 60 is the smallest base that is divisible by all 6 of the first counting numbers. I wonder if the base 60 numbering system is a coincidence?)

I personally count large numbers (such as the number of graduates walking across the stage) using base 20. It's amazing how high you can count on just your fingers and toes! :-p

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K