Can an operator without complete eigenstates be measured?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurement of operators with incomplete eigenstates, specifically focusing on the operator xp+px. It is established that for an operator to be measurable, it must be Hermitian, which guarantees a complete set of eigenstates. The participants agree that since xp+px does not possess a complete set of eigenstates, it cannot be considered an observable. The uncertainty principle further supports this conclusion, as measuring xp+px would not yield precise eigenstates due to the inherent limitations of simultaneous measurements of position and momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenstates and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of the uncertainty principle
  • Basic concepts of Hilbert space in quantum theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the uncertainty principle on measurements
  • Investigate the structure of Hilbert space and its relation to observables
  • Review quantum mechanics literature, such as Griffiths' textbook, for axioms regarding observables
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the measurement theory and the properties of operators in quantum systems.

lackrange
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Say you have some operator A with an incomplete set of eigenstates, but the state of the system is such that it happens to be expressible as a sum (possibly infinite, or integral, whatever) of the eigenstates of A, and let's say the eigenvalues are real and whatever is necessary...we may assume that A is a dynamical variable. Can A be measured?

The justification that an observable must have complete eigenstates is that if you make a measurement corresponding to the observable on a system, the system will jump into one of the observables eigenstates. But why must any state be expressible as a sum of an operators eigenstates, rather than just the current one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order for an operator to represent an observable it must be Hermitian. Hermitian operators always have eigenfunctions that form a complete set, so in order for something to be an observable it must be Hermitian and that implies that its eigenfunctions are complete.
 
I believe there are subtleties. I don't think the operators are necessarily hermitian on the whole Hilbert space. xp+px is hermitian, but I don't believe it has a complete set of eigenstates. So maybe the operator A isn't defined on the whole Hilbert space..
 
I do not believe xp+px is considered an observable because you would not be able to measure an exact eigenstate due to the uncertainty principle.
 
You wouldn't be measuring x and p separately and then putting them together to get xp+px...you would just be making one measurement, xp+px.
 
Yes I understand this. I am saying that I do not believe that xp+px is measurable because it does not have a complete set of eigenstates. I used the uncertainty principle to offer an explanation as to why it may not be able to be measured.
 
Right. But that is my question. If the system happens to be in an eigenstate of xp+px (I am not claiming they are complete, there just needs to be one), then could you make a measurement of xp+px?
 
Sorry I confused myself, in Griffiths it is stated as an axiom that all observables with Hermitian operators have a complete set of eigenfunctions. If xp+px does not have a complete set, it is not observable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K