Can Any Traceless Self-Adjoint 2x2 Matrix Be Expressed Using Pauli Matrices?

Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody, a teacher of mine has told me that any complex, self adjoint matrix 2*2 which trace is zero can be written as a linear combination of the pauli matrices.
I want to prove that, but I haven't been able to.
Please, could somebody point me a book where it is proven, or tell me how to do it?

Thanks for reading
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just try to form arbitrary linear combination of Pauli matrices and see if the resulting matrix complies with the requirement of being called self-adjoint and has zero trace.
$$A = c_1\sigma_1 + c_2\sigma_2 + c_3\sigma_3$$
where the ##c##'s are real constants.
 
Frank Einstein said:
Hi everybody, a teacher of mine has told me that any complex, self adjoint matrix 2*2 which trace is zero can be written as a linear combination of the pauli matrices.
I want to prove that, but I haven't been able to.
Please, could somebody point me a book where it is proven, or tell me how to do it?

Thanks for reading

Write down a general ##2 \times 2## matrix as

\left(\begin{array}{cc} a+bi & c+di \\ e + fi & g + hi \end{array} \right)

Now require the matrix to be self-adjoint and traceless. What constraints does this put on ##a,b,\ldots,h##? Try to see how the resulting matrix can be written as a linear combination of the three Pauli matrices.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top