Expressing a Matrix as a Linear Combination of Pauli Spin Matrices

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing a matrix D as a linear combination of Pauli spin matrices, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics and linear algebra. The original poster is tasked with showing that D can be represented in a specific form while also considering its properties, such as being unitary and traceless.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of D being a unitary matrix and question whether it can be traceless. They discuss the relationship between D and the properties of Pauli matrices, including the conditions under which D can be expressed in the desired form.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining different interpretations of the problem. Some have raised concerns about the assumptions regarding D's properties, while others seek clarification on how to approach the original question. Guidance has been requested, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted ambiguity regarding whether D is unitary or traceless, which affects the feasibility of expressing it as a linear combination of Pauli matrices. The original poster is new to the topic, which may influence the depth of understanding in the discussion.

physics2000
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Pauli Spin matrices (math methods in physics question)

Show that D can be expressed as:

D=d_1\sigma_1+d_2\sigma_2+d_3\sigma_3

and write the d_i in terms of D's elements, let D also be Unitary

Homework Equations



- Any 2x2 complex matrix can be written as :

M=m_1\sigma_1+m_2\sigma_2+m_3\sigma_3+m_0I where "I" is the identity matrix

- Pauli spin matrix properties

-require that D have 0 trace


The Attempt at a Solution



no idea where to begin honestly. please don't ding me ! This is the first day I've ever dealt with pauli spin matrices :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is simply given that D is a unitary matrix, then this is not true. For example, take D to be a unit matrix (which is clearly unitary). Then, as you correctly point out, it is not traceless, and cannot be represented in that way.

What is D supposed to be?

If D is unitary, then it may be written in an exponential form:
<br /> D = \exp(i X)<br />
What property does X have if D is unitary? What if D has a unit determinant?
 
thanks for the reply,

thats exactly what I'm confused about...assume D is traceless and not unitary, does this make more sense to you? I get what you are saying, and I completely agree

I assume from the question that D is supposed to be like M in the relevant equations section, in which the \sigma_i correspond to the pauli matrices 1,2 and 3
 
Dickfore said:
If it is simply given that D is a unitary matrix, then this is not true. For example, take D to be a unit matrix (which is clearly unitary). Then, as you correctly point out, it is not traceless, and cannot be represented in that way.

Even though not every unitary 2x2 matrix is traceless, there are many unitary matrices that are tracekess, i.e., there are many unitary matrices that can be written in the form D of the original post. For example, each Pauli matrix is unitary and traceless. So is i \left( \sigma_1 + \sigma_3) \right)/\sqrt{2}. So is ...
 
Thanks for the reply, I have no idea though how to answer the original question or start it. May I have some guidance :D?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K