Can anyone explain Interstellar Questions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various questions and interpretations of the film "Interstellar," focusing on its scientific concepts, plot points, and character actions. Participants explore themes related to time travel, communication across dimensions, and the design of space habitats, as well as the implications of these elements within the narrative.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why Cooper returns to Saturn instead of Earth, suggesting logistical reasons related to space travel.
  • There is confusion regarding Murph's presence at Cooper Station on Saturn while she is said to remain on Earth, with some proposing she travels there by a faster spaceship.
  • The method by which Cooper sends Morse code through a wristwatch is debated, with some suggesting it involves manipulating the watch's second hand and others proposing it involves gravitational signals transmitted backwards in time.
  • Participants discuss the design of the habitats at Cooper Station, with references to the O'Neill cylinder as a scientifically plausible structure.
  • There are differing interpretations of the depiction of time travel and dimensions in the film, with some asserting that Cooper exists in a 5th dimension while others argue he is in a device that allows him to perceive past events and transmit signals.
  • Some participants reference Kip Thorne's book for insights into the scientific ideas presented in the film, while others express uncertainty about the film's adherence to these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the film's scientific accuracy and narrative elements. There is no consensus on the interpretations of time travel, communication methods, and character actions.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight limitations in the film's explanations, with participants noting the absence of clear dialogue or signage regarding certain scientific concepts and plot devices.

  • #31
"Since 1 hour on Miller's planet is 7 years to a distant observer, those waves might as well have been standing still from afar."

In the vicinity of a black hole, very strong tidal forces can be expected, Jupiter isn't a black hole, but it generates very strong tidal effects on Io.

2. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/survival-on-mars.765443/
My topic about Mars colonization, maybe we can continue there the planetary thing.
My last answer here (i think not entirely OFF, as it was also a question in the movie, whether we should search for a quite Earth like planet, or build space stations) : spin up the colony to mimic gravity also requires lots of propellant, aerobreak can help landing on Mars, once you landed a proper colony seed, you can access lots of useful materials even on foot (thanks to gravity, thick layer of dirt is enough for radiation protection for example), and have a whole planet to expand the colony, a railway enough to transport between them.
I admit the return to Earth part is harder, but in the movie, they didnt want to return.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
GTOM said:
"Since 1 hour on Miller's planet is 7 years to a distant observer, those waves might as well have been standing still from afar."

In the vicinity of a black hole, very strong tidal forces can be expected, Jupiter isn't a black hole, but it generates very strong tidal effects on Io.

Tidal force depends on the gradient of the field. Kip Thorne worked out Gargantua's characteristics based on the plot's necessities, one of which was that Miller's planet has to be exceptionally close without being torn apart by tidal forces. Hence, a black hole at least 100 million times more massive than the sun and circumference comparable to the that of Earth's orbit around the sun.

2. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/survival-on-mars.765443/
My topic about Mars colonization, maybe we can continue there the planetary thing.

I'll check it out.

My last answer here (i think not entirely OFF, as it was also a question in the movie, whether we should search for a quite Earth like planet, or build space stations) : spin up the colony to mimic gravity also requires lots of propellant

Solar system's full of comets. Saturn especially has a lot of ice-water in her rings.

aerobreak can help landing on Mars

For certain interplanetary trajectories. Not terribly helpful for Mars orbital paths. And also you still have the problem of getting people and stuff off Mars. These are problems you don't have with the enormous amount of weakly gravitating rubble falling all over the place in our solar system.

once you landed a proper colony seed, you can access lots of useful materials even on foot (thanks to gravity, thick layer of dirt is enough for radiation protection for example), and have a whole planet to expand the colony, a railway enough to transport between them.

You have lots of materials in asteroids, on lightly gravitating moons and planetoids, in comets, and in Saturn's rings. And you have the whole of empty space in which to expand.

I admit the return to Earth part is harder, but in the movie, they didnt want to return.

But they might want to get to other destinations in space.
 
  • #33
Continuing discussion of planetary chauvinism and Marshots here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K