Can anyone help with cylindrical polar coords?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving cylindrical polar coordinates (r, φ, z) from Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) in classical mechanics. The key relationships established are r = √(x² + y²), φ = arctan(y/x), and z = z. The unit vectors in cylindrical coordinates can be expressed in terms of Cartesian coordinates through a matrix of partial derivatives, which can be inverted to obtain the desired transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian coordinates and their geometric representation
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of matrix operations and derivatives
  • Concept of unit vectors in different coordinate systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of cylindrical polar coordinates from Cartesian coordinates in detail
  • Learn about the transformation matrices between different coordinate systems
  • Explore the applications of cylindrical coordinates in physics problems
  • Investigate the use of Jacobian matrices in coordinate transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students in classical mechanics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to understand coordinate transformations in three-dimensional space.

kala
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a question in my classical mechanics book, and i am not very good with polar coordinates. I am suppose to fine r, phi, z in terms of x,y,z.
Basically I need to derive the cylindrical polar coordinates from the Cartesian coordinates.
The question specifically asks Find expressions for the unit vectors r,phi,z of cylindrical polar coordinates in terms of the Cartesian coordinates.

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have drawn a picture of cylinder and labeled everything i could. Now I know z=z, that is no problem. I know that x=r*cos[theta] and y=r*sin[theta], I also know that r=sqrt[x^2+y^2] and i know that phi=arctan[y/x]. The only way that i know how to derive these is drawing a triangle and showing it, is there any other way, like actually deriving them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is any other way. The polar coordinates, in the first place, are defined by the drawing you have made, so in my opinion, there is no more "fundamental" way to arrive at the relations.
 
You can construct a matrix of partial derivatives that convert from polar to Cartesian (the way you know how to do, obviously, from your post). Then, invert the matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K