The discussion revolves around a mathematical age problem presented in a puzzle format. Participants explore the implications of the wording and the relationships between the ages of two individuals, Holly and Ivy, at different points in time. The focus is on setting up equations based on the problem's conditions and determining how to interpret the ambiguous phrasing.
Participants generally disagree on the clarity of the problem's wording and whether the information provided is sufficient or contradictory. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of the equations and the reference year.
The discussion highlights limitations in the problem's phrasing, with participants noting ambiguities and the potential for misreading the conditions. There is also a recognition of the need for careful definition of variables to approach the problem effectively.
pinball1970 said:
Yeah, "curious" kev wasn't very curious after all.pinball1970 said:
27 in the post #24 is the result of my misinterpretation of the problem statement and you can skip it.pinball1970 said:
“ago” is correct in this case. See the original post.pinball1970 said:
It is better to assume ignorance before malevolence. Please remember, I am a real human being. You must imagine that you are talking to me in a room and that you can see my facial reaction to your comment. From what I've read, Gavran and PeroK have been very helpful. Thanks.phinds said: