Can anyone solve this age problem?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious Kev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Algebra Puzzle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around a mathematical age problem presented in the book "Mathematical Conundrums" by CRC Press, 2023. Participants analyze the ambiguous wording of the problem, which involves establishing equations based on the ages of two individuals, Holly and Ivy. The consensus is that the problem contains contradictory information, leading to confusion about the correct interpretation and solution. Ultimately, the correct answer to the question "How many years ago was that?" is determined to be 6 years ago, based on the established equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic equations and variables
  • Familiarity with age-related word problems
  • Ability to interpret ambiguous mathematical statements
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation, including variables like H and I
NEXT STEPS
  • Study algebraic problem-solving techniques for age-related puzzles
  • Learn how to interpret and clarify ambiguous mathematical language
  • Practice setting up and solving equations based on word problems
  • Explore resources on mathematical notation and its applications in problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics enthusiasts, educators, students tackling algebraic problems, and anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in age-related scenarios.

  • #31
pinball1970 said:
I missed a Teams because of this.
1736451996637.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
pinball1970 said:
Not to me and @Curious Kev was on the site less that three hours regarding this question. That's bad form on pf Kev.
Yeah, "curious" kev wasn't very curious after all.
 
  • #33
pinball1970 said:
What does 27 mean?
27 in the post #24 is the result of my misinterpretation of the problem statement and you can skip it.

pinball1970 said:
I think I don't like the word "ago."
Should it be "before?"
“ago” is correct in this case. See the original post.
 
  • #34
phinds said:
Yeah, "curious" kev wasn't very curious after all.
It is better to assume ignorance before malevolence. Please remember, I am a real human being. You must imagine that you are talking to me in a room and that you can see my facial reaction to your comment. From what I've read, Gavran and PeroK have been very helpful. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K