MHB Can anyone suggest some reading material for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material Reading
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm doing a quantitative finance research project that is based on the following papers:

"Systemic Risk and Sovereign Debt in the Euro Area" - Deyan Radev (can be downloaded here: Systemic Risk and Sovereign Debt in the Euro Area by Deyan Radev :: SSRN)

and

"Consistent Information Multivariate Density Optimizing Methodology" - Segoviano (found here: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24511/1/dp557.pdf)

I have a fairly good mathematical background, however I was wondering if anyone can suggest me some good mathematical texts I can read in order to understand the proofs outlined in the Appendices of Radev's paper, more specifically it is appendix 3 which troubles me the most as I am very unfamiliar with the mathematics in that appendix, so I need to do some background mathematics reading first.

Also with the paper by Segoviano, again I was wondering if anyone can suggest me some good texts to read to understand the maths presented in sections 2.2-2.3 (page 11-16).

In general, I am just wishing to read whatever is required in order to understand the proofs and arguments presented in the aforementioned parts.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Usagi, :)

Usagi said:
I have a fairly good mathematical background, however I was wondering if anyone can suggest me some good mathematical texts I can read in order to understand the proofs outlined in the Appendices of Radev's paper, more specifically it is appendix 3 which troubles me the most as I am very unfamiliar with the mathematics in that appendix, so I need to do some background mathematics reading first.

Did you refer,

Botev, Z., and D. Kroese, 2011, The Generalized Cross Entropy Method, with Applications to Probability Density Estimation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 13 (1): 1-27.

as suggested on Appendix 3 ?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top