Can Artificial Gravitational Fields Create Wormholes for Space Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Space-time
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the hypothetical possibility of creating artificial gravitational fields to form wormholes for space travel, suggesting that such a feat would require gravitational forces comparable to those of a black hole. Achieving this would necessitate an immense amount of energy, potentially exceeding the total energy output of the sun over its lifetime, and the creation of exotic matter that may not exist. While concepts akin to wormholes exist in solutions to Einstein's equations, practical implementation faces significant challenges, including energy control and stability issues. Methods like antimatter and cold fusion are proposed as potential energy sources, but they are deemed insufficient for the task. Overall, the feasibility of artificial wormholes remains highly speculative and fraught with insurmountable obstacles.
The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I've heard a lot about how an extremely powerful gravitational force can distort space and time. I was wondering (hypothetically) if it is possible to distort space-time enough by focusing a somehow artificial gravitational field into a single tiny point to pop a hole in space-time and travel vast distances through the cosmos in very little time. Sort of like an artificial wormhole. I am not a physicist, but I'm guessing that would require generating a gravitational field powerfully equal to that of a black hole. Which is probably impossible.

But if it were actually possible, human beings could travel to other galaxies, solar systems, in search for habitable, extra-solar planets to colonize, or perhaps search for extraterrestrial life.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are solutions to Einsteins equation that are a lot like what you describe, but don't expect to be able to buy wormhole generators at IKEA anytime soon. There are lots of problems: You'd probably need more energy than the sun radiates in its lifetime. You need to produce large amounts of a type of matter that may not even exist. You need to be able to control said matter precisely. And maybe a wormhole would collapse immediately due to virtual particles going around it in a loop infinitely many times.
 
Fredrik said:
There are solutions to Einsteins equation that are a lot like what you describe, but don't expect to be able to buy wormhole generators at IKEA anytime soon. There are lots of problems: You'd probably need more energy than the sun radiates in its lifetime. You need to produce large amounts of a type of matter that may not even exist. You need to be able to control said matter precisely. And maybe a wormhole would collapse immediately due to virtual particles going around it in a loop infinitely many times.

Perhaps that energy can be produced using anti-matter or cold fusion? When anti-matter collides with matter, they annihilate each other and create pure energy. However, I don't know if there is any way to control that reaction and use it as energy, and not create an explosion equal to that of 500 megatons of TNT.

Although that will probably still not produce anywhere near enough energy to create a wormhole.

Here, look at this. :P

2427438338_a6d762ee8e.jpg
 
Last edited:
The_Absolute said:
Perhaps that energy can be produced using anti-matter or cold fusion? When anti-matter collides with matter, they annihilate each other and create pure energy.
No. Both fusion and matter/anti-matter annihilation are insufficient to produce that kind of energy. There are some order of magnitude estimates in "The physics of Star Trek", by Lawrence Krauss. It's a good book, so you might want to check it out.
 
I don't know how much energy is required, but I'll take Fredrik's word for it that it's on the order of the solar luminosity emited over the lifetime of the sun.

To show you a rough estimate of the vast energy that is:

So, the sun fuses over 610 tons of hydrogen every second into about 606 tons of helium.

That's 4 tons of mass converted into pure energy every second. Using matter-antimatter annihilation you can do this using just 4 tons of material, instead of the 610 tons required by fusion. But still, 4 tons is quite a lot.

So, if the energy radiated over the lifetime of the Sun, that's about 10 billion years, is the energy you need, you need to convert over 1.2 quintillion tons of matter into pure energy using annihilation to get it. (For a rough idea of how much matter that is, it's about 3.4 trillion empire state buildings)
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K