Can Ax = λx + b Be Solved in Euclidean Spaces?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation Ax = λx + b can be solved in finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces under specific conditions. If b = 0, a solution exists if λ is an eigenvalue of matrix A. When b ≠ 0, the equation can be rewritten as (A - λI)x = b, requiring that A - λI be surjective, which is true when λ is not an eigenvalue of A. Therefore, solutions exist for any λ that does not correspond to an eigenvalue of A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with matrix operations, specifically matrix inversion
  • Knowledge of finite-dimensional vector spaces
  • Basic concepts of surjectivity in linear mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix using tools like NumPy in Python
  • Study the properties of surjective linear transformations in linear algebra
  • Explore numerical methods for solving linear equations, such as Gaussian elimination
  • Investigate the implications of perturbations in eigenvalue problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data scientists, and engineers working with linear systems and eigenvalue problems in finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces.

ahmethungari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is there any solution for the following problem:

Ax = \lambda x + b

Here x seems to be an eigenvector of A but with an extra translation vector b.
I cannot say whether b is parallel to x (b = cx).

Thank you in advance for your help...

Birkan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmethungari said:
Hi,

Is there any solution for the following problem:

$Ax = \lambda x + b$

Here $x$ seems to be an eigenvector of $A$ but with an extra translation vector $b$.
I cannot say whether $b$ is parallel to $x$ ($b = cx$).

Thank you in advance for your help...

Birkan

You didn't say what vector space you are working with, so I will assume a complex finite-dimensional vector space.

We can rewrite your problem as

(A - \lambda I)x = b

If b = 0, this has a solution if and only if lambda is an eigenvalue of A. Every map in a complex finite-dimensional vector space has an eigenvalue, so a solution exists in this case.

If b \neq 0, then this is equivalent to

b \in image(A - \lambda I)

For this to happen, it suffices that A - \lambda I be surjective. This is true if and only if A - \lambda I is invertible, which is true if and only if lambda is NOT an eigenvalue of A. Thus there are plenty of solutions in this case!
 
jbunniii said:
You didn't say what vector space you are working with, so I will assume a complex finite-dimensional vector space.

We can rewrite your problem as

(A - \lambda I)x = b

If b = 0, this has a solution if and only if lambda is an eigenvalue of A. Every map in a complex finite-dimensional vector space has an eigenvalue, so a solution exists in this case.

If b \neq 0, then this is equivalent to

b \in image(A - \lambda I)

For this to happen, it suffices that A - \lambda I be surjective. This is true if and only if A - \lambda I is invertible, which is true if and only if lambda is NOT an eigenvalue of A. Thus there are plenty of solutions in this case!


I got it. By the way, vector space is actually finite-dimensional (d=9000) Euclidean Space.

Since I do not know the \lambda, (only A and b are known) how can I find an numeric solution for that? Is there any way using eigenvalue logic here?
Such as
-- find eigenvalues of A,
-- check if b is parallel to any
-- select the appropriate eigenvector etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K