Can Bacteria Safely Produce Venom for Anti-Venom Research?

AI Thread Summary
A community college student is exploring an honors project focused on developing a new method for producing antivenom. The proposed approach involves genetically modifying bacteria to produce venom, similar to how insulin is manufactured, to avoid the ethical concerns of milking venomous animals. The student is concerned about the feasibility of this method, particularly whether the venom would harm the bacteria during production and the potential safety and ethical implications of creating a potent venom. Suggestions from the discussion include the possibility of using natural venom to produce monoclonal antibodies instead of directly producing venom, as well as cautioning about the complexity of snake venoms and the appropriateness of such a project for an honors designation. Concerns were raised regarding the safety and regulatory aspects of genetically modifying bacteria to produce toxic substances.
Hopper_18
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Honors Project involving anti venom thoughts/suggestions
Hello,
I am a community college student currently in cellular and molecular biology. I wanted to do an honors project for this class and I was hoping I could get some thoughts or suggestions on this idea.

My project idea is this; I want to help make anti venom through a new and creative way. I was thinking that currently anti venom process is made through the same system that it has been used for years where the snake or venomous animal is milked for its venom and then injected into a horse or other animal.

Specifically, I was focusing on the getting of the venom. Milking animals for there venom is dangerous and I feel bad for the animals. I know that one way insulin is made is by adding the gene sequence for it into a bacteria plasmid which then goes into the bacteria. You then have the bacteria making insulin constantly.

I was hoping of doing something similar with the gene sequence for a neurotoxin for example. Put in into a plasmid and grow bacteria to mass produce venom of some organism where anti venom is needed. I was wondering though, if this would actually work or would the venom just kill the bacteria on the way out of the bacteria?

Also I don’t want to accidentally hurt myself, and I feel like my school wouldn’t approve of me making a true venom assuming it does work, so if anyone has some idea for either a lot less powerful venom or perhaps another idea for something good to create from bacteria transfection, that would be super helpful.

Thank you in advance for all help and ideas!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Bacterially produced venom may lack post translational modifications that might affect its possible antigenicity. The post-translational modifications might only occur in eukaryotes.
Alternatively, use natural venom to produce antiserum monoclonal antibodies. If you find good ones, than further milking for venom might not be necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes Khi Choy Xichdu and berkeman
Hopper_18 said:
I was hoping of doing something similar with the gene sequence for a neurotoxin for example.
- Are you sure that a genetic modification of bacteria which supposed to produce deadly substances is within the acceptable scope for a honors project?

- snake venoms, for example are complex.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top