Can Baghdad be taken quickly by the coalition forces?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Viper
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the timeline and challenges of coalition forces taking Baghdad during the Iraq War. Participants express varying opinions on the strength of the Republican Guard, with some predicting a swift capture within two to three weeks, while others caution that urban warfare in Baghdad could prolong the conflict. Key points include the coalition's initial success against the Republican Guard, concerns about potential use of weapons of mass destruction, and the impact of environmental factors on troop performance. Overall, the consensus leans towards a belief that Baghdad will eventually fall to coalition forces, albeit with continued resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of military strategy and urban warfare tactics
  • Familiarity with the geopolitical context of the Iraq War
  • Knowledge of the capabilities and history of the Republican Guard
  • Awareness of the implications of environmental conditions on military operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the tactics used by coalition forces in urban warfare scenarios
  • Study the historical performance and strategies of the Republican Guard
  • Examine the effects of environmental factors on military operations in desert conditions
  • Analyze the role of media and propaganda in shaping public perception during the Iraq War
USEFUL FOR

Military historians, defense analysts, and individuals interested in the dynamics of urban warfare and coalition military operations during the Iraq War.

  • #61
Originally posted by kyleb
or rather part of the intent, sometimes.
OMG, can you get any more weasely (there is a better word, but I can't think of it right now)? It wasn't even your comment, you shouldn't feel the need to weasel out of it. Let it go.


Back to the thread title, I predict Baghdad will fall...




...NOW!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Zargawee, it didn't take very long for Baghdad to collapse, did it? The war was an easy one and Saddam's army was pretty feeble. And Saddam does not seem to be loved by the people there.
 
  • #63
Originally posted by russ_watters
OMG, can you get any more weasely (there is a better word, but I can't think of it right now)? It wasn't even your comment, you shouldn't feel the need to weasel out of it. Let it go.

i was just calling it how i see it. there is no reason to be a prick.
 
  • #64
Originally posted by N_Quire
Zargawee, it didn't take very long for Baghdad to collapse, did it? The war was an easy one and Saddam's army was pretty feeble. And Saddam does not seem to be loved by the people there.
Ya, good luck with that, N_Quire...
 
  • #65
Originally posted by kyleb
i was just calling it how i see it. there is no reason to be a prick.

HEY! I'm the prick here! Let's get that straight!
 
  • #66
well i am not handing out any awards Alias, but you do have some stiff competition. :wink:
 
  • #67
Wellbits almostover now isn`t it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
908
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K