Can Calculus Validate the Proof of w=(k/m)^(1/2) in SHM Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brendan3eb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equation w=(k/m)^(1/2) in the context of simple harmonic motion (SHM) using calculus. The user derives this equation by taking the second derivative of the position function x(t)=A*cos(wt+θ) to find acceleration and relates it to Hooke's Law (F=-kx). The proof is validated by substituting initial conditions and simplifying the equation. Additionally, the user inquires about the acceptance of using x(t)=A*cos(wt+θ) as a given in the AP Physics C: Mechanics exam, to which the consensus is affirmative, with a note on considering initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM) principles
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Knowledge of Hooke's Law (F=-kx)
  • Basic concepts of initial conditions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the position function x(t)=A*cos(wt+θ) in SHM
  • Learn about the implications of initial conditions on SHM equations
  • Explore the application of calculus in solving physics problems, particularly in mechanics
  • Review past AP Physics C: Mechanics exam questions related to SHM
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for the AP Physics C: Mechanics exam, physics educators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of simple harmonic motion.

brendan3eb
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
So I am attempting to prove the simple harmonic motion equations with calculus so as to develop a better understanding of shm problems and have more flexibility when it comes to solving them. I am having a bit of trouble understanding the proof of w=(k/m)^(1/2)

Here is how I am doing it. I am taking the x(t)=A*cos(wt+θ) equation and then the second derivative of it to find acceleration

a(t)=-A*w^2*cos(wt+θ)
F=ma=-kx
a=-kx/m
-A*w^2*cos(wt+θ)=-kx/m
so I am guessing that I can make a few assumptions to solve for the final equation. If I assume that the time t=0, thus we x=A, I can solve
-x*w^2*cos(w(0)+0)=-kx/m
x's cancel out
w^2*cos(0)=k/m
w=(k/m)^(1/2)

Is this a valid way to prove the equation? Also, I am assuming that the original x(t) equation is correct, I do not know how to prove it. Is there a way to prove the original x(T) equation? Finally, I am preparing for the AP Physics C: Mechanics exam, so if I were to solve a problem using Calculus, for those of you familiar with the exam, would the graders allow me to start off a proof of an answer with x(t)=A*cos(wt+θ) as a given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah you should be fine, BUT I would recommend recalling that :

x[t] = A Cos wt + B Sin wt

there's two parts depending on your initial conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K