Can clocks explain the probability of finding a particle in motion?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Derek M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interpretation of a concept from "The Quantum Universe: Everything That Can Happen Does Happen" regarding the use of "clocks" to represent the wave function of a particle in motion. Participants explore the implications of how these clocks constructively interfere within a specific region relative to the particle's initial position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why the clocks only add constructively within a certain region left of point X, despite visualizing them adding constructively at any point between the original cluster and X.
  • Another participant suggests that the author's statement may involve considerations of waves with differing frequencies, questioning if this could explain the behavior of the clocks.
  • A third participant emphasizes the difference between learning physics and learning about physics, suggesting that popular science books may not provide a working knowledge of the subject.
  • A later reply acknowledges the need to understand key concepts and indicates that the participant owns a textbook for deeper study.
  • One participant expresses doubt about the suggestion regarding differing frequencies, indicating they do not believe this is the case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the clocks' behavior, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining regarding the underlying concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the assumptions behind the clocks' behavior, particularly regarding the implications of wave interference and the potential influence of frequency variations.

Derek M
New to physics and attempting to get my feet wet reading "The Quantum Universe: Everything That Can Happen Does Happen" by Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw. Looking to get some clarification on what I hope is a simple concept regarding a particle in motion.

The author introduces the use of "clocks" to represent the magnitude and phase of a particles wave function. Shown below is a figure from the book showing a cluster of clocks corresponding to a particle that is initially located within the clusters vicinity. The author states that as each clock in the cluster makes its way to X, it is wound forward. Due to the way each clock has been wound backwards relative to its position in the original cluster, every clock that reaches X has its clock hand pointing in exactly the same direction. They all add together constructively which represents a high probability of finding the particle at X.
20171012_162216.jpg


This part I understand. My confusion is when the author suggests that the clocks only add together constructively at all points left of X for a distance equal to the length of the original cluster. Outside of that region the clocks largely cancel out. When I picture in my head the clocks winding forward as they move to a point anywhere between the original cluster and X it seems to me that they add together constructively no matter where that point my be.

I hope I have explained my problem well enough and appreciate any insight into where I might be failing to grasp the concept.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I don't have that book, but when the author talks about the clocks only adding constructively inside a certain region, it sounds like he is considering many waves of differing frequencies (wavelengths). Could that be the case?
 
Derek M said:
New to physics and attempting to get my feet wet reading "The Quantum Universe: Everything That Can Happen Does Happen" by Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw.
Are you aiming to learn physics or to learn about physics? Popular scientific books will give you a general flavour and a story of what is going on, but you should not expect to obtain any sort of working knowledge from them. If you want to learn physics, you should instead pick up real textbooks that actually aim at teaching the subject. Also, it is a much more tedious and demanding process than learning about physics is.
 
Orodruin said:
Are you aiming to learn physics or to learn about physics?

I guess ultimately I'm trying to understand some of the key concepts. It's quite possible I'm getting a head of myself. I do own a textbook, so I will look through it and determine if its contents are more aligned with my desired knowledge. Thank you for the insight.
 
sandy stone said:
Sorry, I don't have that book, but when the author talks about the clocks only adding constructively inside a certain region, it sounds like he is considering many waves of differing frequencies (wavelengths). Could that be the case?

From what I can tell I don't think this is the case. Thank you for the suggestion though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
929
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K